** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981433
Title:
[Asus Zenbook UX3402ZA] Sound doesn't work at all
This was fixed by https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwebengine-
opensource-src/5.15.2+dfsg-3ubuntu1.
And the tests pass since then:
http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/notepadqq/hirsute/armhf.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Package changed:
Hi Christian! In comments #11 and #17 there are some patches for this
bug. They probably need rebasing though.
** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu Zesty)
** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu Eoan)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is
Hi again Juerg and all,
I want to mention that upstream Linux developers actually *do* care
about ABI stability.
For example, one of the commits broke ABI but it was quickly reverted
and then fixed in a way that does not change the ABI:
This bug was fixed in the package alsa-lib - 1.2.2-2.1
Sponsored for Logan Rosen (logan)
---
alsa-lib (1.2.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Matthias Klose ]
* Non-maintainer upload.
[ Sebastien Bacher ]
* debian/patches/python3.8.diff:
- fix the build with python 3.8
I think it changes quite rarely:
- Once it changed in Linux 4.7, in commit [1] (April 2016),
- Then it changed in Linux 5.1, in commit [2] (February 2019).
The Debian maintainer has a patch [3] that updates the SONAME version
when ABI changes.
There has been an attempt [4] to send that patch
Debian has package names that follow upstream SONAME, e.g. libcpupower0,
libcpupower2.
The -dev package is used only for building, the resulting binary
packages get dependency on library package. When there is ABI break,
upstream changes SONAME, so the library package changes too and all
reverse
Hi Juerg!
This is a step towards what we want, but ideally it would be nice to
have an unversioned package (like linux-tools-dev) that would ship some
symlinks in /usr/include and /usr/lib, so that we don’t need to pass -I
and -L to gcc.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Vlad, thanks for testing! I don’t have much time to work further on the
patch (especially when there is no guarantee for it being applied).
Maybe you can try to create an updated patch where dh_makeshlibs will be
properly called during build?
--
You received this bug notification because you are
I had some discussion about this on kernel-team mailing list in
September, and provided a patch which addresses Juerg Haefliger’s
review:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2017-September/086839.html
However there has been no action since then :(
Attaching the new version of the
Dear Tim or somebody from the kernel team — can you please reconsider my
patch, or reply to my proposal in comment #8?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215411
Title:
Hi Tim!
I understand that the user can have multiple kernels installed. However,
I am not sure if supporting multiple versions of a development package
makes sense. After all, there can be only one header file matching i.e.
#include and only one library file matching -lcpupower.
If you really
Added a patch against lp:~ubuntu-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/zesty
that adds a libcpupower-dev package, compatible with what Debian has.
Dear kernel team, please review it.
** Patch added:
"0001-UBUNTU-Add-a-new-libcpupower-dev-package-for-compati.patch"
Can we please have a libcpupower-dev package compatible to Debian
(https://packages.debian.org/sid/libcpupower-dev)?
** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu Saucy)
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
This bug was fixed in the package intel-gpu-tools - 1.13-1
Sponsored for Logan Rosen (logan)
---
intel-gpu-tools (1.13-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release.
- Drop unneeded build-dep on swig. (Closes: #803522)
-- Vincent Cheng Wed, 23 Dec
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1503655 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1503655
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1503655
Kernel bug in eventpoll_release_file+0x46/0xa0 with 3.13.0-66.107
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
This looks like a duplicate of bug 1503655, though I am not sure about
that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1504072
Title:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
Public bug reported:
After upgrading the kernel from 3.19.0-29 to 3.19.0-31, the system is
unusable. It boots to the desktop, but immediately after that gets a
kerneloops, and neither mouse nor keyboard is working.
This is a regression introduced in a Vivid SRU.
ProblemType: KernelOops
** Description changed:
- After upgrading the kernel from 3.19.0-29 to 3.19.0-31, the system is
+ After upgrading the kernel from 3.19.0-30 to 3.19.0-31, the system is
unusable. It boots to the desktop, but immediately after that gets a
kerneloops, and neither mouse nor keyboard is working.
Not a bug in gnome-panel if it also happens with Unity and KDE.
** Package changed: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) = linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393878
Title:
This bug was fixed in the package libmpc - 2:0.1~r459-4.1
Sponsored for Jackson Doak (noskcaj)
---
libmpc (2:0.1~r459-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Hideki Yamane ]
* Non-maintainer upload.
- auto detect aclocal/automake/autoconf version (Closes: #713209)
- include
This bug was fixed in the package libmpc - 2:0.1~r459-4.1
Sponsored for Jackson Doak (noskcaj)
---
libmpc (2:0.1~r459-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Hideki Yamane ]
* Non-maintainer upload.
- auto detect aclocal/automake/autoconf version (Closes: #713209)
- include
syncpackage: Error: Source package libmpc is blacklisted.
syncpackage: If this package needs a fakesync, use --fakesync
syncpackage: If you think this package shouldn't be blacklisted, please file a
bug
syncpackage: explaining your reasoning and subscribe ~ubuntu-archive.
syncpackage: Blacklist
This package was removed and blacklisted on 2010-03-26, but it exists
again since 2010-07-28
(https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmpc/2:0.1~r459-1/+publishinghistory).
I think it should be removed from blacklist. Subscribing ~ubuntu-
archive.
--
You received this bug notification because you
ScottK: I believe yes.
libmpc (2:0.1~r435-2) experimental; urgency=low
* Updating epoch and upload to experimental to give maintainers of packages
that depend on libmpc-dev again some more time to port their applications
to the new API.
--
You received this bug notification because
25 matches
Mail list logo