Go drum up some support and nag https://launchpad.net/~mlankhorst to
actually fix it. He knows the fix, just will not commit time to it.
Get it passed around the heat built up (that is get people to mark it
as 'affects me')
Regards,
Phill.
On 23 May 2014 20:27, Kevin Masaryk <1080...@bugs
Don't go complaining to me.. they marked it as won't fix... all I do is
tell people the workaroud it was, and still an WTF moment that they
will refuse to even look at the issue --- but there you go... a couple of
extra steps... choose 'extra' switch the video mode to SVGA. click on 'OK
(or wha
it may be worth asking the x-server team if they have received the
proposed fix and what their attitude of implementing it is so that it
lands with the kernel team. I've never had communication with the
x-server team, but have found the kernel team to be absolute stars of
the first magnitude in hel
https://launchpad.net/~f-jack My dear friend... My reply to the bug was such
that I know it is a bug (and I have asked others to verify). Using #15 does
make things easier as the devs can see who has what and ask if they can check
out things :) Go rally some troups for the bug, go see if you ca
Brightening and darkening is working fine with lubuntu 14.04 My hardware
is http://phillw.net/hardware/aDU4RVzY If you want to let the devs know
more of your system please do have a read of
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Hardware This actually makes the tasks of
the devs a little easier as they may
Hi Joe,
IMHO this can be marked as invalid. It was just a FUD created when
hunting down the actual issue (which has been wonderfully solved thanks
to your patience).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https:/
@ Erick, please do so using the instructions from #24. The
'conversation' between a bug being reported by lots of people and the
questions so far asked are lamentable. There is a bug, the devs need
more information. Our head of QA suggested the link in #24; which from I
can read should have been do
Hi, could you have a read through
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingUbiquity and see if you make the bug
reproducable.
Regards,
Phill.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122016
Joe, I've just had a thought as zram is actually a compressed area
of RAM and not a physical device, why would we expect parted to
recognise what is going on? As far as I can read, it is actually
reporting things entirely correctly.
parted is a disk partitioning and partition resizing
It seems I made a mess of installing the 3.11.4 kernel... It now seems
to support zram.. I also re-installed the 3.12.rc1 kernel. both show the
parted -l error. Details below:
phillw@piglet:~$ uname -a
Linux piglet 3.11.4-031104-generic #201310051136 SMP Sat Oct 5 15:38:11 UTC
2013 x86_64 x86_64
zram is called by an upstart job in lubuntu. I'll re-check to see if
zram swap is enabled with the 3.12 kernel, but it will be tomorrow.
Regards,
Phill.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
ignore the ps -ef, it is a red herring!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1235525
Title:
error on sudo parted -l
Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in
Hi Joe,
phillw@piglet:~$ uname -a
Linux piglet 3.11.4-031104-generic #201310051136 SMP Sat Oct 5 15:38:11 UTC
2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
phillw@piglet:~$ swapon -s
FilenameTypeSizeUsedPriority
/dev/sda6 pa
As requested, the other issue has been reported at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1235525 this is for
saucy. For reporting in raring, please raise a new bug report and
mention the 1235525 bug so the kernel team can look into what the issue
is.
--
You received this bug notifi
Public bug reported:
In the current kernel issuing such a command results in the following
output:
Error: /dev/zram0: unrecognised disk label
Error: /dev/zram1: unrecognised disk label
This bug will be tied to the raring kernel which also sees it.
The 3.12rc1 and 3.12rc2 kernel does not show t
Hi Nio,
I just popped desktop amd64 onto my VM, no hang and..
swapon -s reports zram as being in use.
Happy days!
Phill.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1227202
Title:
Joe, it may be worth looking at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1215379 to see if
we would be going that route (all far too technical for me !).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://
i *think* lubuntu uses a slightly different setting for configuring up
zram in our desktop images. This was turned on only for lubuntu-desktop
as far as I'm aware (e.g. does not apply to alternate).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscr
Hi Nio,
with the new kernel, zram is turned off. It not only causes the fail
after install, is suspected of random freezes that we've seen but also
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2162655&page=3 It's a shame
they didn't file a bug back then as we'd have had much more time to
investigate :
Hi Joe,
install went okay, (slow, but to be accepted with 512MB RAM and Ubuntu).
Reboot did not freeze and the system rebooted fine. Uses a heck of a lot
of swap (again to be expected). So, the major bug is now resolved. We
can now look at other issues once we have a full set of ISO's for
lubuntu.
Ubuntu ISO is 1GB+ in size (hence it taking so long for me to download
it). Lubuntu ISO's are CD sized at ~700MB :) Beggars can't be choosers!
512MB is the absolute minimum for Ubuntu (from in 13.04 release), I've
not tried a Ubuntu 13.10 ISO this testing cycle so far.
Phill.
--
You received thi
Nio,
I still have 90 mins to go for my local download to be completed. As you
have seen, I've asked on lubuntu-qa mail listing to see if there are
others who can get a test done more quickly. If I use QEMU to fire up a
KVM on my dedi server, it will slow down the down-load to my local
machine whic
Joe,
thanks, that's great... we have the same figures!
Phill.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1227202
Title:
Unexpected freezes Saucy
Status in “linux” package in Ubunt
Nio,
I've just pulled it into my dedi-server...
Length: 1049980928 (1001M) [application/x-iso9660-image]
appears to match your file length and md5sum gives
e939fec65cd6d9a01689b22468f2300a ubuntu-13.10-desktop-amd64-lp1227202.iso
That's as close as I can get to confirm things.
Regards,
Phill.
I'm grabbing now, but a full ISO takes a while on my 'narrow' band.
could you post up the md5sum of the ISO so we know we have a non-
corrupted version. as regards to the other issue(s), these are reported
by amd-mac / 32 bit /ppc etc. which do not have access to the cherry-
picked kernel fix as th
The kernel in #6 does not crash, but there has not been an ISO made with
it in to see if it resolves the hang at the end of desktop install of
Lubuntu on Low RAM machines.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
ht
Joe,
there is also http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-
ppa/mainline/v3.12-rc2-saucy/
I've not pulled that one in, as you requested rc1. I'm happy to pull
that one in if requested.
Phill.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to lin
Joe,
the new kernel does not have the error as reported on
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2162655&p=12735571#post12735571
I think, there for that the zram team have been true to their word of
having it fixed. This close to kernel freeze, apart from zero, what are
the chances of bumping
hi Joe,
I downloaded http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-
ppa/mainline/v3.12-rc1-saucy/linux-
headers-3.12.0-031200rc1-generic_3.12.0-031200rc1.201309161735_amd64.deb
and then did
sudo dpkg -i linux-
image-3.12.0-031200rc1-generic_3.12.0-031200rc1.201309161735_amd64.deb
Here goes a reboot wish
I'm beginning the thought that
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2162655&p=12735571#post12735571
actually holds the key to this issue. They may well be 2 separate bugs,
but they both head towards zram. It seems very broken.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The kernel boots and system does not crash when asked to use swap. An
ISO needs to be generated to check that this does fix the issue with the
installer system. (This is just an update from email and IRC
conversations for people following the bug).
--
You received this bug notification because yo
Public bug reported:
When using desktop-installer with lubuntu there is a freeze at the very
end (bug 1225429) which also affects desktop-i386 and desktop-amd64.
There are also unexplained freezes on the system when using it. Further
tracking down has found
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t
Public bug reported:
When updating the kernel today to 3.11.0-4-generic I saw the same
warning messages I saw when I upgraded to 3.11.0-3-generic
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.11.0-4-generic
W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/radeon/KAVERI_sdma.bin for module
radeon
W:
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Saucy)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066435
Title:
powerpc: "Fixing recursive fault but reboot is n
34 matches
Mail list logo
