*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1213119 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1213119
** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1213172
Ubuntu flavours <=12.04.1 may cause trouble regarding making a 16bit; or
wanting to use a 16bit ESP whereas firmwares are looking for 32bit ESP= no
worky!? The workaround is to allow installer to run as it wants to but be sure
to copy ESP save in another location then delete 16bit ESP and remake
On different hardware GA A75 UD4H this is a very similar issue
regarding using EFI to install Ubuntu. Have tried from 11.04 and up to
13.04 all with same result ie does not run installer in EFI mode,
noefi does not work for me but running installer using BIOS/legacy mode
does work then installing
Christopher M . Penalver; Apologies for posting technical inaccuracies
to an unrelated bug report. Have unmarked as affected here and will
follow your advice. My troubles now seem (to me)to be vendor/firmware
related and will subscribe you to another bug report.
--
You received this bug notific
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1213119 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1213119
Sorry for not replying quicker. Just acknowleging last comment and
would like to confirm this possible bug i am trying to describe is at
install time. Also this is duplicate due to me trying to add report
Apologies once again. Now understand S U B are only sysrq commands
allowed by default by the use of bitmask 176 which for it is easy to
change or adapt relevant settings to any other commands as needed or
desired. This for me is applicable to 12.10 and 13.04 desktop amd64.
Suprisingly very little i
Sorry wrong link- intended to post http://askubuntu.com/questions/11002
/alt-sysrq-reisub-doesnt-reboot-my-laptop
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025467
Title:
sysrq is n
If sysrq is disabled by default and users are saying it works for them
(Ask Ubuntu) ie http://askubuntu.com/questions/53263/shut-down-computer-
from-keyboard/53266#53266 Perhaps this is evidence of why full
disablement of sysrq is applied by default? ie If user did not set sysrq
on; Who did?
--
Booting Ubuntu Desktop amd64 liveDVD (3.8.0-19-generic) in BIOS mode
searching "computer" using file manager to find sysreq settings is now
found in /etc/systl.d and named 10-magic-sysrq.conf. Looking in my
Ubuntu partitionb which was last bootable using 3.8.0.28 kernel; also
confirms sysrq as b
This affects raring
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025467
Title:
sysrq is now completely disabled, it would be nice to maintain the
ability to reboot etc
Status in “l
Uploaded this report with intaention of adding as affected to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1213119
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1213172
Title:
"
Public bug reported:
will use url to add linux as affects to this bug report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubiquity/+bug/1213119
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic 3.8.0-19.29
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-19.29-generic 3.8.8
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-19
Taking Secure Boot out of equation indicates this is almost certainly a
grub 2 deficiency or bug
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1072378
Title:
[Asus Eee PC 1015BXO] Ubunt
This affects precise,quantal , and raring. Have not tried saucy yet.
Is there a way to confirm the first stage installer are capable of running on
an EFI system that is not secure boot capable? Is shim required on non
SecureBoot system?
I suspect if shim/ first stage installer are not able to
This error is reproducable on my hardware >=12.04.2 with EFI mode on.
Am posting this from 13.04 amd 64 desktop live session because of this
error and others possibly associated with it. Using ga a75 ud4h mobo
with latest firmware which uses EFI 1.1 rev 2 specification firmware.
rEFInd sees this
15 matches
Mail list logo
