[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2024-09-24 Thread Frank Heimes
** Tags added: petest-459 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to makedumpfile in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564475 Title: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems: Fix Releas

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-04-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I see, thanks a lot!. Opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/makedumpfile/+bug/1570775 to generate and use cio_ignore in kdump. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to makedumpfile in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-04-14 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
s390-tools zipl generation bug report https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools/+bug/1570645 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to makedumpfile in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564475 Title: 128M is not e

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-04-14 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
@thorsten If I understand correctly cio_ignore command needs to be on the running instance that is about to crash, rather than on the re-exec kernel. Thus it needs to be computed and added to e.g. /etc/zipl.conf. At the moment we do not generate/update /etc/zipl.conf in an automated way, but the m

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-04-14 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Server guide bug number https://bugs.launchpad.net/serverguide/+bug/1570644 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to makedumpfile in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564475 Title: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPAR

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-04-11 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin--- ** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin1604 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to makedumpfile in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564475 Title: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-04-11 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: makedumpfile (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to makedumpfile in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-04-11 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package s390-tools - 1.34.0-0ubuntu5 --- s390-tools (1.34.0-0ubuntu5) xenial; urgency=medium * Add condition to cpacfstatsd.service to only start on LPARs (which may still fail, if LPAR is not configured with the right counters). * Add a system group

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-04-11 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package zipl-installer - 0.0.33ubuntu3 --- zipl-installer (0.0.33ubuntu3) xenial; urgency=medium * Reluctantly Bump crashkernel to 196M, as otherwise 128M is not enough by default to collect a kdump on any LPAR, defeating the intended purpose in the

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-04-11 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Also affects: zipl-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: s390-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: makedumpfile (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: High => Low ** Changed in: s390-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Un

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-04-09 Thread Louis Bouchard
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Assignee: (unassigned) => Louis Bouchard (louis-bouchard) ** Also affects: makedumpfile (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: High Assignee: Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team) Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you a

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-04-08 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to makedumpfile in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564475 Title: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs Stat

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-04-08 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to makedumpfile in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564475 Title: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LP

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-04-01 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 1 April 2016 at 12:22, Louis Bouchard wrote: > If there is a way to determine if we're on a zVM or Lpar, I could adapt > kdump-config to add the appropriate crashkernel=value pair in > /etc/zipl.conf and re-run zipl upon installation of kdump-tools, which > is required in order to capture a dum

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-04-01 Thread Louis Bouchard
If there is a way to determine if we're on a zVM or Lpar, I could adapt kdump-config to add the appropriate crashkernel=value pair in /etc/zipl.conf and re-run zipl upon installation of kdump-tools, which is required in order to capture a dump. -- You received this bug notification because you ar

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-04-01 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
"Ok, if we go with the 128M default our current assumption is that on all LPARs kdump for Ubuntu will fail." -> well, that doesn't sound good either, cause then essentially we take away 128M of RAM away without actually providing anything to the LPAR installations =( -- You received this bug noti

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-04-01 Thread Louis Bouchard
***WARNING*** KDUMP_CMDLINE_APPEND is used to add parameters to the command used by kexec to reboot when the system crashes. Adding crashkernel= there is useless and will most likely be ignored. The crashkernel= parameter has to be made available on the system when it first boots so having it in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-03-31 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
128MB is just a sensible default enabled by default everywhere, if in your case you need more do adjust it accordingly in /etc/zipl.conf and execute `sudo zipl` and then reboot. There is no dynamic sizing / computation of zipl.conf and/or crashkernel paramemter on Ubuntu, and on all architectures

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-03-31 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I do not want to increase it beyond 128MB by default, as this amount of memory is reserved by default on all installations big or small. And there will always be newer kernel (that reserves more memory) or more devices that require higher values. Adjusting kernel args in /etc/zipl.conf is well-know

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1564475] Re: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs

2016-03-31 Thread Gary Gaydos
** Package changed: ubuntu => makedumpfile (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to makedumpfile in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564475 Title: 128M is not enough for kdump on s390 LPARs Status in makedumpfil