On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 06:40 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 17:07 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > One additional sanity check could be to rebase security 6f0f0fd4963 on top
> > of the c142bda458a and then see if bisection among those security commits
> > on top yields to the
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 17:07 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:44 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 21:51 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > >
> > > Since 2.6.22.19-cfs-v24.1 and 2.6.23.17-cfs-v24.1 schedule
Hello all,
I am sorry for delay.
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272
> Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI
> 9835
> Submitter : Jaswin
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:44 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 21:51 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > Since 2.6.22.19-cfs-v24.1 and 2.6.23.17-cfs-v24.1 schedulers are
> > identical, and these are essentially identical with 2.6.2
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:44 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 21:51 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 09:18 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > Numbers from my Q6600 Aldi supermarket box (hm, your box is from
> > > > different
