[Cc netdev]
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 09:09:44AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known
2009/8/25 Rafael J. Wysocki :
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
> Subject : acer_wmi causes stack corruption
> Submitter : Rus
> Date : 2009-06-12 08:13 (75 days old)
It has patch, just Len doesn't seem to... don't know, read the topic?
On Tuesday 25 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?i
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:27:41AM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> [Cc netdev]
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 09:09:44AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:27:41AM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> 64 pages, presumably 256k, for fw->boot_size while current ipw
> firmware images have ~188k. I don't know jack squat about this
> driver, but given the field name and the struct:
>
> struct ipw_fw {
> __le32 v
yes, this is still the case, the same script (netcfg from archlinux)
fails during boot too.
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Plea
Dne Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:05:07 +0200 (CEST) Rafael J. Wysocki napsal:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and
Hi Pekka,
> Can you reproduce the bug without the proprietary nvidia module that
> seems to be loaded?
I am sorry but I forgot to test that and right now I am not very keen on
trying again since this is my primary machine and I had quite some fs
corruption (ext4 on md raid5 -> no barriers) the
(cc IPW maintainers and mailing lists)
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:37:49 +0100 Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:27:41AM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > [Cc netdev]
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 09:09:44AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Rafael J.
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:47:13 +0200 Rafa__ Mi__ecki wrote:
> 2009/8/25 Rafael J. Wysocki :
> > Bug-Entry __ __ __ : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
> > Subject __ __ __ __ : acer_wmi causes stack corruption
> > Submitter __ __ __ : Rus
> > Date __ __ __ __ __ __: 2009-06-12 08:13
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Matthias Dahl wrote:
>> Can you reproduce the bug without the proprietary nvidia module that
>> seems to be loaded?
>
> I am sorry but I forgot to test that and right now I am not very keen on
> trying again since this is my primary machine and I had quite some fs
>
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 17:59 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Matthias Dahl
> wrote:
> >> Can you reproduce the bug without the proprietary nvidia module that
> >> seems to be loaded?
> >
> > I am sorry but I forgot to test that and right now I am not very keen on
> > t
(Dropped unrelated CCs.)
Andrew Morton wrote:
> I'm not seeing any linux-acpi emails from Len since August 14.
>
> So I merged this patch and shall send it along with
>
> thermal_sys-check-get_temp-return-value.patch
> acpi-dont-call-acpi_processor_init-if-acpi-is-disabled.patch
Thanks for that
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:33:34 +0200
Frans Pop wrote:
> (Dropped unrelated CCs.)
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I'm not seeing any linux-acpi emails from Len since August 14.
> >
> > So I merged this patch and shall send it along with
> >
> > thermal_sys-check-get_temp-return-value.patch
> > acpi-
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2009/8/25 Rafael J. Wysocki :
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
> > Subject : acer_wmi causes stack corruption
> > Submitter : Rus
> > Date: 2009-06-12 08:13 (75 days old)
>
> It has
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, David Hill wrote:
> It seems to be fixed in 2.6.31-rc7
Thanks, bug closed.
Rafael
> On 2009-08-25, at 17:05, "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.3
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the cu
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> Dne Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:05:07 +0200 (CEST) Rafael J. Wysocki napsal:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the curre
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Tomas M. wrote:
> yes, this is still the case, the same script (netcfg from archlinux)
> fails during boot too.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regression
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira wrote:
> A patch has been proposed in the bugreport that fixes the problem, so if the
> patch is commited, the regression is fixed for me. I don't think the patch
> was
> commited yet.
Well, honestly, it doesn't seem it will
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Yes, it still is valid.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following b
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> Still present as of -rc6-git7 (didn't try -rc7)
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
>
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Matthias Dahl
> wrote:
> >> Can you reproduce the bug without the proprietary nvidia module that
> >> seems to be loaded?
> >
> > I am sorry but I forgot to test that and right now I am not very keen on
> > trying
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30.
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Walt Holman wrote:
>
> - "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify i
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please
- "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Walt Holman wrote:
> >
> > - "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> >
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a
> report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:12:03 +0200
>> Krzysztof has a patch which has corrected this issue for me. Thanks,
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Do you have a pointer to the patch, please?
commit 6ff9c2e7fa8ca63a575792534b63c5092099c286
Author: Krzysztof Hałasa
Date:
The bug is still present in v2.6.31-rc7.
To make it easier to reproduce, I attached my config to this mail.
Jan
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry i
On Thursday 27 August 2009, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:12:03 +0200
>
> >> Krzysztof has a patch which has corrected this issue for me. Thanks,
> >
> > Thanks for the update.
> >
> > Do you have a pointer to the patch, please?
>
> commit 6ff9c2e
On Thursday 27 August 2009, Jan Scholz wrote:
>
> The bug is still present in v2.6.31-rc7.
Thanks for the update.
> To make it easier to reproduce, I attached my config to this mail.
Can you also attach it to the bug entry, please?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
32 matches
Mail list logo
