On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:41:46 +0100 (CET)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary
> report of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be li
Hello,
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:42:44 +0100 (CET)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary
> report of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still sho
On Friday, December 03, 2010, Paul Rolland wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:42:44 +0100 (CET)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary
> > report of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current lis
On Friday, December 03, 2010, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 00:41:45 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
On Friday, December 03, 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.36.
On Friday, December 03, 2010, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 12/02/2010 05:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> > tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
>
On Friday, December 03, 2010, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 12/02/2010 05:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.3
On Friday, December 03, 2010, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 00:41 +0100 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
>
> The BUG still happens:
>
> [0.502550] BUG: scheduling whil
Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 00:41 +0100 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
The BUG still happens:
[0.502550] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/1/0x0002
[0.502574] Modules linked in:
[
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracki
10 matches
Mail list logo