On Tuesday 25 August 2009, Dan Williams wrote:
>On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 12:09 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Friday 21 August 2009, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:17 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >> On Thursday 20 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote
On Friday 21 August 2009, Dan Williams wrote:
>On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:17 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Thursday 20 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >On Thursday 20 August 2009, roel kluin wrote:
>> >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>On Thursday 20 August 2009, roel kluin wrote:
>> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
>> > Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
>> > Submitter : Daniel Mack
>> > Date
and let me know
>(either way).
>
>
>Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13899
>Subject: Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
>Submitter : Gene Heskett
>Date : 2009-08-01 13:04 (19 days old)
>References
e know
>(either way).
>
>
>Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13899
>Subject: Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
>Submitter : Gene Heskett
>Date : 2009-08-01 13:04 (9 days old)
>References
e know
>(either way).
>
>
>Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13899
>Subject: Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
>Submitter : Gene Heskett
>Date : 2009-08-01 13:04 (2 days old)
>References
either, cuz its existed since at least Fedora 2. Here, fedora is on its way
out, 64 bit mandriva sure looks nice. And DiskDrake Just Works(TM).
Thanks Rafael, I thought it was being ignored.
>
>Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13841
>Subject :
On Thursday 09 July 2009, John Stoffel wrote:
>>>>>> "Gene" == Gene Heskett writes:
>
>Gene> On Wednesday 08 July 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:15:15PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:
On Wednesday 08 July 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:15:15PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:42:07PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
>> I guess your near 800MB slab cache is somehow under scanned.
>
>Gene, can you run .31 with
On Wednesday 08 July 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:15:15PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
>> I guess you can only use 3G ram because there is a big memory hole.
>> Your HighMem zone spanned 951810 pages, 813013 of which is present.
>> So it's not quite accurate for the OOM mess
On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:56:00AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Greetings all;
>>
>> I had to hard reset this box just now as there was no response to a
>> ctl-alt- bksp when X was un-responsive this morning.
>>
&g
On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Minchan Kim wrote:
>On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 02:01:03 +0200 (CEST)
>
>"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.
and let me know
>(either way).
>
>
>Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11465
>Subject: Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log
>Submitter : Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date : 2008-08-30 18:52 (1 days old)
>Refere
13 matches
Mail list logo
