[3.0-rc1][NMI/DMAR][iwlagn] errors - PCI system error
> > (SERR) for reason a1 on CPU 0
> > Submitter : Shawn Starr
> > Date : 2011-06-03 4:56 (24 days old)
> > Message-ID: <4478124.oufngap...@segfault.sh0n.net>
> > References : http://marc.i
ntry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37232
> Subject : [3.0-rc1][NMI/DMAR][iwlagn] errors - PCI system error
> (SERR)
for
> reason a1 on CPU 0 Submitter : Shawn Starr
> Date : 2011-06-03 4:56 (24 days old)
> Message-ID: <4478124.oufngap...@s
: [3.0-rc1][NMI/DMAR][iwlagn] errors - PCI system error
> (SERR)
for
> reason a1 on CPU 0 Submitter : Shawn Starr
> Date : 2011-06-03 4:56 (10 days old)
> Message-ID: <4478124.OuFNgaPiHS@XX>
> References: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kerne
[hda-conexant][2.6.38-rcX] external
microphone
> sound too quiet Submitter : Shawn Starr
> Date : 2011-02-19 6:02 (85 days old)
> Message-ID: <474630.25335...@smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
> References: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=1298095365
(Hermosa)
I have not had time to do any investigations to look at the git changes made.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29672
> Subject : [regression][ALSA][hda-conexant][2.6.38-rcX] external
microphone
> sound too quiet Submitter : Shawn
/show_bug.cgi?id=28832
> Subject : [regression][2.6.38-rcX][net][iwlagn] WiFi signal
> after period
of
> time tanks causing contant drops Submitter: Shawn Starr
>
> Date : 2011-02-07 3:54 (6 days old)
> Message-ID: <613373.34172...@smtp106.rog.m
ll should be listed and let the tracking
>team
>know (either way).
>
>
>Bug-Entry: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311
>Subject: [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500
>laptop
>Submitter: Shawn Starr
>Date
On Monday, July 19, 2010 09:12:08 pm Shawn Starr wrote:
> On Monday, July 19, 2010 08:33:30 pm Shawn Starr wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 08, 2010 11:36:25 pm Shawn Starr wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.o
On Monday, July 19, 2010 08:33:30 pm Shawn Starr wrote:
> On Thursday, July 08, 2010 11:36:25 pm Shawn Starr wrote:
>
>
>
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311
> > > > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-r
On Thursday, July 08, 2010 11:36:25 pm Shawn Starr wrote:
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311
> > > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo
> > > W500 laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr
>
- Original Message
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
To: Shawn Starr
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List ; Kernel Testers
List ; Maciej Rutecki
Sent: Fri, July 9, 2010 5:01:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo
W500 laptop
On Friday, July 09,
2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old)
> > Message-ID :
> >
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2
>
> See earlier about these being marked as regressions, but it should be
> fixed by commit dc61b1d6 ("sched: Fix PROVE_RCU vs
hould be listed and let the
> tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311
> Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo
> W500
> laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr
>
6.32 and 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15245
> Subject : [2.6.33-rc6 Weird JCPU times?
> Submitter : Shawn Starr
> Date
On Monday 25 January 2010 12:20:38 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > On Monday 25 January 2010 05:35:50 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Shawn, why can't you use dynamic ticks ? In the bugzilla I just see
> > > that you worry abou
On Monday 25 January 2010 05:35:50 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 January 2010 17:04:33 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
>
sted and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14859
> Subject : System timer firing too much without cause
> Submitter : Shawn Starr
> Date : 2009-12-21 19:16 (35 days old)
Continues with -rc5
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 14:28:04 Shawn Starr wrote:
2.6.33-rc4 (Sun Jan 17 04:26:20 EST 2010 git snapshot) has different behavour.
I cannot enable dynamic ticks. Must boot with nohz=off.
The rescheduling interrupts no longer is increasing rapidly, seems to be a
normal rescheduling period
sted and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14859
> Subject : System timer firing too much without cause
> Submitter : Shawn Starr
> Date : 2009-12-21 19:16 (21 days old)
Yes please keep
sted and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14859
> Subject : System timer firing too much without cause
> Submitter : Shawn Starr
> Date : 2009-12-21 19:16 (21 days old)
Yes please keep
On October 29, 2009 06:34:45 pm Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 03:57:32PM -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> >> This but is *not* fixed. I just triggered it a few minutes ago by
> >> abusing i915 and drm, which caused a p
21 matches
Mail list logo
