Re: [Bug #14265] ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100

2009-11-23 Thread Karol Lewandowski
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 04:02:11PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14265 > Subject : ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, > mode:0x8020 w/ e100 > Submitter : Karol Lewandowski > Date : 2009-09-15 12:05

[Bug #14265] ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100

2009-11-21 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way

Re: [Bug #14265] ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100

2009-11-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday 17 November 2009, Karol Lewandowski wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:01:19AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. > > > > The following bug entry is on the curr

Re: [Bug #14265] ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100

2009-11-16 Thread Karol Lewandowski
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:01:19AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.

[Bug #14265] ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100

2009-11-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way

Re: [Bug #14265] ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100

2009-10-28 Thread Karol Lewandowski
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 08:31:54PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14265 > Subject : ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, > mode:0x8020 w/ e100 > Submitter : Karol Lewandowski > Date : 2009-09-15 12:05

[Bug #14265] ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100

2009-10-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way

Re: [Bug #14265] ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100

2009-10-13 Thread Karol Lewandowski
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 04:05:36AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" > Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:01:08 +0200 (CEST) > > [ Netdev CC:'d ] > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14265 > > Subject : ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5,

Re: [Bug #14265] ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100

2009-10-12 Thread David Miller
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:01:08 +0200 (CEST) [ Netdev CC:'d ] > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14265 > Subject : ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, > mode:0x8020 w/ e100 > Submitter : Karol Lewandowski > Date

[Bug #14265] ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100

2009-10-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way

[Bug #14265] ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100

2009-10-01 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way