Re: [Bug #14874] Ath5k regression with commit 8bf3d79bc401ca417ccf9fc076d3295d1a71dbf5

2010-01-11 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday 11 January 2010, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> > of recent regressions. >> > >> > The followin

Re: [Bug #14874] Ath5k regression with commit 8bf3d79bc401ca417ccf9fc076d3295d1a71dbf5

2010-01-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday 11 January 2010, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.

Re: [Bug #14874] Ath5k regression with commit 8bf3d79bc401ca417ccf9fc076d3295d1a71dbf5

2010-01-11 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.32.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me kno

[Bug #14874] Ath5k regression with commit 8bf3d79bc401ca417ccf9fc076d3295d1a71dbf5

2010-01-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_