Re: [Bug #15034] volano ~30% regression

2010-01-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday 12 January 2010, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 21:08 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday 11 January 2010, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 23:32 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a

Re: [Bug #15034] volano ~30% regression

2010-01-11 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 21:08 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday 11 January 2010, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 23:32 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > > of recent regressions. > > > > > > The foll

Re: [Bug #15034] volano ~30% regression

2010-01-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday 11 January 2010, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 23:32 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6

Re: [Bug #15034] volano ~30% regression

2010-01-10 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 23:32 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me k

[Bug #15034] volano ~30% regression

2010-01-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_