Get hot in a while http://utx.eslihos.net/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kernel-testers in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Notes:
* Some new regressions from 2.6.28 have been reported since the release of
2.6.29, so here's an update of the regression list.
* I could have missed some fixes due to the large amounts of stuff merged
recently. Please have a look at the list and let me know if I can drop
anything
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13019
Subject : /proc/pid/maps offset output broken in 2.6.29
Submitter : Chris Friesen cfrie...@nortel.com
Date : 2009-04-01 23:18 (6 days old)
References
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:05:38AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 06:15:09AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:05:38AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 06:15:09AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:05:38AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following
On Monday 06 April 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13019
Subject : /proc/pid/maps offset output broken in 2.6.29
Submitter : Chris Friesen cfrie...@nortel.com
Date
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12870
Subject : 2.6.29-rc TKIP: replay detected regression
Submitter : Hugh Dickins h...@veritas.com
Date : 2009-03-11 12:07 (27 days old)
References:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13019
Subject : /proc/pid/maps offset output broken in 2.6.29
Submitter : Chris Friesen cfrie...@nortel.com
Date : 2009-04-01 23:18 (6 days old)
References:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:05:41PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12909
Subject : boot/kernel init duration regression from 2.6.28
Submitter : CaT c...@zip.com.au
Date : 2009-03-16 10:25 (22 days old)
* Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@sisk.pl) wrote:
On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 06:15:09AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:05:38AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
Hi Rafael,
Yes, it is still a problem. I have identified it as far down to being
an alsa problem. Please follow the other thread related to this. I
posted some more recent data, with strace info and such. I also used
git bisect to narrow it down. I wasn't, however, able to understand
what
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Trenton D. Adams
trenton.d.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rafael,
Yes, it is still a problem. I have identified it as far down to being
an alsa problem. Please follow the other thread related to this. I
Oops, sorry, I should make clear that it is not an alsa
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:55:05PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12490
Subject : ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter : Sergey S. Kostyliov rathamah...@gmail.com
Date : 2009-01-12 7:38 (85
On 4/6/09, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13018
Subject : 2.6.29 on MacBook 2,1 fails to reboot
Submitter : Trenton Adams
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Trenton D. Adams wrote:
This went through bisection, but looking at the email log, I tend to
suspect that maybe Trenton marked some versions good even though they
weren't (because they got versions numbers from v2.6.27), and didn't
realize that that messes up
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Trenton D. Adams wrote:
This went through bisection, but looking at the email log, I tend to
suspect that maybe Trenton marked some versions good even though they
weren't (because
46 matches
Mail list logo
