On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Thomas Petazzoni <
thomas.petazz...@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:23:37 +0900
> anish singh wrote:
>
> > I have a touch driver which is not yet using threded_irq.So i am planning
> to
> > change it to
> > use threaded_irq.
> >
> >
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 8:50 PM, John Mahoney wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:22 AM, er krishna wrote:
>> Yes its fine, I am just wandering if this option is enabled by bios ? How ?
>
> In sys these values are listed on a per cpu basis.
>
> To list possible governors:
> cat /sys/devices/system
Hello All,
I have written two network drivers master0 and slave0, where the
packets received by master0 interface will be forwarded to the slave0
interface and vice versa. I have further linked the master0 interface to a
usb driver in such way that, interface registered only on connecting
hi :
2011/3/3 Beraldo Leal :
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:36:50PM +0800, loody wrote:
>> hi beraldo:
>>
>> 2010/12/20 Beraldo Leal :
>> > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:45:47PM +0800, loody wrote:
>> >> Dear all:
>> >> I recently trace FS/fat and I want to know is there any utility under
>> >> linux t
Hi,
I recently got to know about kprobes for dynamically putting probes inside
Linux kernel. I tried some simple probes and it worked well. Now to extend
the understanding on kprobes and using it for some useful work, I'm planning
to gather some data on a particular driver(say network driver) by
i
Salut Thomas,
Thanks! Your answer is appreciated.
I know that what I'm trying to do seems to weird and does not follow the
best practice I've learned. But currently it's not the appropriate
moment to do such changes in board kernel. So I have to provide a quick
solution with a LKM.
>
> I have
Hello,
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:23:37 +0900
anish singh wrote:
> I have a touch driver which is not yet using threded_irq.So i am planning to
> change it to
> use threaded_irq.
>
> In the current handler they are first disabling the irq line and then
> calling the single threaded
> workqueue to d
Hello Maurus,
Glad to see you're experimenting what you've seen in the kernel
training :-)
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 14:08:34 +0100
"Frey ext-FA, Maurus" wrote:
> I wrote a simple module, which should initialise an USART in RS485-mode
> (RTS stays low after initialisation) and register it as platform_
Hi All,
I want clarification is anybody verify this feature on ARM or MIPS architecture.
http://lwn.net/Articles/381677/
Kind regards
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
>
> Why?
>
As I understand msleep() will stop for a minimum of two jiffies and
that resolution is too low in systems with small HZ values (big
jiffies).
Using msleep() (with small values) in this systems will sleep for more
time than the caller expe
>
> This seems unnecessary, what problem do the current macro definitions
> create?
>
Probably the change is unnecessary, the only value is that it silences
a checkpatch error:
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis
Sorry for the noise.
--
-
Hi,
I had asked a similar question before, but I've some doubts regarding the
correctness of the following code. Please see the following code snippet from
the file linux-2.6.37/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c. This is the core function of
apm thread.
Question:
Suppose the apm thread has just comple
hi beraldo:
2010/12/20 Beraldo Leal :
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:45:47PM +0800, loody wrote:
>> Dear all:
>> I recently trace FS/fat and I want to know is there any utility under
>> linux that can help us to easily parse BPB/BS or FAT tables?
>
> http://gitorious.org/unix-stuff/fat-util ?
>
I do
13 matches
Mail list logo
