Hi :)
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 09:07, Parmenides wrote:
> Actually, a common characteristics of Linux's schedulers is that
> timeslices will be longer with priorities raising .
generally I agree with that :)
> I am just curious
> about why the the schedulers takes this policy.
simply to say
Hi Jeff,
2011/9/27 Jeff Donner :
> Well, if it doesn't need more time then it doesn't matter what its priority
> is,
> when it goes to sleep waiting for some IO it yields back the
> remainder of its time. You could give it as long a timeslice
> as you like; it won't use more than it needs, becau
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 15:17, 陳國成 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I encounter a strange problem when using 2.6.30 kernel.
>
> There are two processes, one runs main1() and the other runs main2().
> Two processes are running simultaneously on uni-processor system.
> Besides, eth0 is a proprietory ethernet driver
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Parmenides
wrote:
> 2011/9/26 Mulyadi Santosa :
>>>Actually, the CFS scheduler which
>>> is a new scheduler in Linux kernel also does the same thing. But, I
>>> think this way does not fit with scheduler's principle.
>>
>> remember the keyword you ask? "fairness"?
Hello Matt,
Thank you for your answer.
The driver is a simple one (hello) and does not require any hardware.
Sincerely,
Yacob Hassidim.
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Schulte"
To: "Yacob Hassidim"
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Automatic module insert i
2011/9/26 Mulyadi Santosa :
> Hi :)
>
>>Actually, the CFS scheduler which
>> is a new scheduler in Linux kernel also does the same thing. But, I
>> think this way does not fit with scheduler's principle.
>
> remember the keyword you ask? "fairness"? that is being fair to all
> processes but si
well, use the term "cpu affinity" when u google and u will find more
info (correct) from others - my answer is not complete - there are
situation where u can do tuning - read further here:
http://honglus.blogspot.com/2011/03/tune-interrupt-and-process-cpu-affinity.html
http://www.ibm.com/developer
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 05:59:19PM +0530, Sahana B Adiga - ERS, HCL Tech wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> For a new storage hardware we have a Linux device driver that uses a
> custom library for hardware interface. This h/w interface library is
> an intellectual property. We want to share the Linux device
Hi All,
For a new storage hardware we have a Linux device driver that uses a custom
library for hardware interface. This h/w interface library is an intellectual
property. We want to share the Linux device driver source code, but not the
library source code.
1) Is it possible to add to the L
- Original Message -
From: "Yacob Hassidim"
To: "Mulyadi Santosa"
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: Automatic module insert in boot time
> Hello Mulyadi,
>
> Thank you for your response.
>
> I read the best way to automatically insert a module is via the
> /etc/mo
Thanks so much for the detailed info. It's very comprehensive. Thanks for
taking the time.
On Sep 26, 2011, at 6:51 AM, Peter Teoh wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Kernel Piddu wrote:
>>
>>> I have a multi processor system/machine and I would like dedicate a CPU
>>> entirely to list
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Kernel Piddu wrote:
>
> > I have a multi processor system/machine and I would like dedicate a CPU
> > entirely to listen on to a port.
> > I would greatly appreciate if you could tell me how this can be done.
> >
> > Thanks!
>
doing this in the kernel, is perhaps
Hello,
I have some problems with a USB headset with PTT functionality on it,
the audio works well, but not the PTT.
I attached error messages from different kernels, also the device's description.
The insertion receive error: generic-usb: probe of 0003:074D:3576.0002
failed with error -22
and the P
Hi,
I encounter a strange problem when using 2.6.30 kernel.
There are two processes, one runs main1() and the other runs main2().
Two processes are running simultaneously on uni-processor system.
Besides, eth0 is a proprietory ethernet driver.
IFF_ALLMULTI can be set on eth0 successfully most of
Hi Yacob...
2011/9/26 Yacob Hassidim :
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I ask for help to insert/install module automatically in boot time.
>
> I use Ubuntu 11.04.
>
> I try to insert a module automatically in boot time.
>
> I added the name of my module (hello) to the file
Hello everyone,
I ask for help to insert/install module automatically in boot time.
I use Ubuntu 11.04.
I try to insert a module automatically in boot time.
I added the name of my module (hello) to the file /etc/
Hi :)
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 09:16, Parmenides wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that Linux's scheduler tends to allocate longer timeslice
> for processes with higher priority.
"tends".yes, at least theoritically. but not really in every
cases in reality
>Actually, the CFS scheduler whi
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Abhijit Pawar wrote:
> On 09/26/2011 12:57 PM, rohan puri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Abhijit Pawar wrote:
>
>> On 09/26/2011 12:26 PM, rohan puri wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Abhijit Pawar
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/2
On 09/26/2011 12:57 PM, rohan puri wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Abhijit Pawar
mailto:apawar.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 09/26/2011 12:26 PM, rohan puri wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Abhijit Pawar
mailto:apawar.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 09/23/2
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Abhijit Pawar wrote:
> On 09/26/2011 12:26 PM, rohan puri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Abhijit Pawar wrote:
>
>> On 09/23/2011 03:11 PM, rohan puri wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Abhijit Pawar wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/23/20
On 09/26/2011 12:26 PM, rohan puri wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Abhijit Pawar
mailto:apawar.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 09/23/2011 03:11 PM, rohan puri wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Abhijit Pawar
mailto:apawar.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 09/23/20
21 matches
Mail list logo
