Re: Check Interface Status

2011-12-30 Thread michi1
Hi! On 12:30 Fri 30 Dec , nilesh wrote: > On Thursday 29 December 2011 08:23 PM, Rahul Kumar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to check the interface status (up/down) within linux kernel. > > Is there any routine (sort of ioctl) to do this. Any code that is > > already in use in kernel would

[BUG] SIOCSIFFLAGS returns -EIO on SMSC LAN911x

2011-12-30 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello, We have an issue with the SMSC LAN911x driver with today linux-2.6 [1] executing on an IGEPv2 [2] board using omap2plus_defconfig. When I try to bring up the network interface, the ioctl set interface flags command (SIOCSIFFLAGS) fails returning -EIO: root@igep00x0:~# ifconfig eth0 up if

Re: Suspicious URL:Re: Check Interface Status

2011-12-30 Thread nilesh
On Friday 30 December 2011 02:06 PM, mic...@michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com wrote: > Hi! > > On 12:30 Fri 30 Dec , nilesh wrote: >> On Thursday 29 December 2011 08:23 PM, Rahul Kumar wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to check the interface status (up/down) within linux kernel. >>> Is there

Re: logging kernel panics with netconsole

2011-12-30 Thread Manavendra Nath Manav
Hi Zac, On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:39 AM, chromaticwt zac wrote: > my laptop is getting kernel panics often. I have a desktop connected to my > internet router via ethernet, and my laptop connected to my router via wifi. > how can I log my laptops panics on my desktop? I'm hoping to do this using

[no subject]

2011-12-30 Thread Philip Anil-QBW348
I want the drivers to be owned by a user, Foo. Whenever the drivers are called by application Duh, I want a program Bar to run after the driver has done its work, since Foo is now running the driver. Is it possible? Anil ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list

Re:

2011-12-30 Thread Alexandru Juncu
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Philip Anil-QBW348 wrote: > I want the drivers to be owned by a user, Foo. Whenever the drivers are > called by application Duh, I want a program Bar to run after the driver has > done its work, since Foo is now running the driver. Is it possible? You can't say a

RE:

2011-12-30 Thread Philip Anil-QBW348
Thanks for replying. Specifically, I want a certain program to be run after the audio and video codecs are run. How do I do that? Anil -Original Message- From: alexandruju...@gmail.com [mailto:alexandruju...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alexandru Juncu Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 11:26 A

RE:

2011-12-30 Thread Alexandru Juncu
On Dec 30, 2011 7:35 PM, "Philip Anil-QBW348" < anil.phi...@motorolasolutions.com> wrote: > > Thanks for replying. Specifically, I want a certain program to be run after the audio and video codecs are run. > How do I do that? > Anil Audio /video codecs are just system libraries not kernel drivers.

RE:

2011-12-30 Thread Philip Anil-QBW348
Audio /video codecs are just system libraries not kernel drivers... You could modify the codec library code to start a new process, but it's hackish... -- Suppose the codecs are owned by a special user, Foo. Then is it possible for Foo to automatically run the program Bar after the codecs fini

RE:

2011-12-30 Thread Alexandru Juncu
On Dec 30, 2011 8:05 PM, "Philip Anil-QBW348" < anil.phi...@motorolasolutions.com> wrote: > > Audio /video codecs are just system libraries not kernel drivers... You could modify the codec library code to start a new process, but it's hackish... > > -- > > Suppose the codecs are owned by a special

RE:

2011-12-30 Thread Philip Anil-QBW348
Ok, but is there a single point in execution before the codecs are called? I am wondering if I can have the program Bar called at this point. Anil ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/

Re:

2011-12-30 Thread Alexandru Juncu
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Philip Anil-QBW348 wrote: > Ok, but is there a single point in execution before the codecs are called? I > am wondering if I can have the program Bar called at this point. Well, I think it depends of the codec (I am not familiar with multimedia programming). But I