On 11/21/2011 07:25 PM, Abhijit Pawar wrote:
On 11/18/2011 09:05 PM, Abhijit Pawar wrote:
On 11/18/2011 08:16 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 06:36:18PM +0530, Abhijit Pawar wrote:
On 11/17/2011 08:19 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 02:15:35PM +0530, Abhijit Pawar wrote:
Thanks!
I do not want to access other PAS when other process is alive, and it seems
impossible because each process has its own page table.
But after its death, some information might be left in the memory if the OS
does not clean the physical pages, I guess. When the OS load a binary
program, so
Yeah, it is the countermeasure of a similar secure risk. But I know little
about Samba, and could you explain more precisely about how the attacker
seek the credentials? That is exactly what I want to test but failed...
Thanks!
2012/1/12 Scott Lovenberg
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:45, Dave
Hi,
Could you explain more about how the OS initialize the malloced pages? Or
which part of the kernel code can do thatThanks!
2012/1/12 Dave Hylands
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:53 AM, 夏业添 wrote:
> > Hi,
> >My tutor asked me to test whether one process leaves information in
> > mem
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 07:42:04PM -0200, André Ferraz wrote:
>
>
> > A: No.
> > Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
>
> Sorry about that
>
> > Why are you using grsec? Why has it not been updated in the many
> > years since 2.6.32 was released?
>
> Grsec patchset bring
> A: No.
> Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
Sorry about that
> Why are you using grsec? Why has it not been updated in the many
> years since 2.6.32 was released?
Grsec patchset brings some security features that i need in my
servers, they are accessible
"夏业添" wrote:
>Hi,
> My tutor asked me to test whether one process leaves information in
>memory after it is dead. I tried to search some article about such
>thing on
>the Internet but there seems to be no one discuss about it. And after
>that,
>I tried to write some program in the User Mode to
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:45, Dave Hylands wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:53 AM, 夏业添 wrote:
> > Hi,
> >My tutor asked me to test whether one process leaves information in
> > memory after it is dead. I tried to search some article about such thing
> on
> > the Internet but there
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:53 AM, 夏业添 wrote:
> Hi,
> My tutor asked me to test whether one process leaves information in
> memory after it is dead. I tried to search some article about such thing on
> the Internet but there seems to be no one discuss about it. And after that,
> I tried to w
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 08:53:07PM +0800, 夏业添 wrote:
>As the man page of malloc said:"The memory is not initialized"
That means, if malloc returns a region that has previously been malloc'd,
written to and free'd, you may get the these previously written data.
HTH,
Jonathan Neuschäfer
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Manavendra Nath Manav
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a 100Mbps LAN with 10 connected terminals through a Switch.
> Now, I understand 100Mbps is the max speed at which a terminal can
> send/receive data. If every terminal sends data at this speed, then
> does this spe
Hi,
My tutor asked me to test whether one process leaves information in
memory after it is dead. I tried to search some article about such thing on
the Internet but there seems to be no one discuss about it. And after that,
I tried to write some program in the User Mode to test it, using fork()
Hi All,
I have a 100Mbps LAN with 10 connected terminals through a Switch.
Now, I understand 100Mbps is the max speed at which a terminal can
send/receive data. If every terminal sends data at this speed, then
does this speed distributes/divides according to load, or is it
dedicated for each termi
13 matches
Mail list logo
