On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, anish kumar
wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 09:43 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>> On 06/26/2012 08:47 AM, Dharam Kumar wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:02 PM, anish kumar
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 23:24 +0530, Dharam Kumar wrote:
>> >>> On Mon
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Matthias Brugger
wrote:
> On 06/26/2012 08:47 AM, Dharam Kumar wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:02 PM, anish kumar
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 23:24 +0530, Dharam Kumar wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:47 PM, anish kumar
wrote:
Hi...
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Jacky lin wrote:
> I check the code, and find the LR is point to smp_cross_call()
>
> void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu)
> {
> smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(cpu), IPI_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE);
> }
from what I know, IPI (Inter Processor Call) is usua
> Now this also means that increasing vmalloc inadvertently reduces lowmem.
> Why is this designed such a way?
It may or may not depending on the amount of physical memory and the
size of the vmalloc space.
vmalloc space will normally increase vmalloc_end, which won't reduce lowmem.
If the
Hi all,
Could any one tell me what does smp_cross_call() means?
My device (Dual call) encounter a soft lockup here with following info:
[ 101.654724:0] PC is at generic_exec_single+0x7c/0x94
[ 101.659698:0] LR is at arch_send_call_function_single_ipi+0x3c/0x48
I check the code, and find the L
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Dave Hylands wrote:
> Hi Subbu,
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Subramaniam Appadodharana
> wrote:
> ...snip...
> >> However, if you call vmalloc and lets suppose that vmalloc just
> >> happens to return 0xE000. The physical address of the first page
>
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 09:43 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> On 06/26/2012 08:47 AM, Dharam Kumar wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:02 PM, anish kumar
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 23:24 +0530, Dharam Kumar wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:47 PM, anish kumar
> >>> wrote:
>
Hi Malice,
On 06/25/2012 09:42 PM, Malice wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm planning to write a new device driver on linux kernel . The device i
> intend to write will be a device that'll pipe the data coming into it to
> another computer that'll be also having the same device . So in short
> the device'll be r
On 06/26/2012 08:47 AM, Dharam Kumar wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:02 PM, anish kumar
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 23:24 +0530, Dharam Kumar wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:47 PM, anish kumar
>>> wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 18:52 +0530, Dharam Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
> I
