Re: If I don't active the page mechanism

2012-11-02 Thread Mulyadi Santosa
Hi Fan yang :) On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Fan Yang wrote: > Hi Mulyadi Santosa > I think the OS can just use the segment mechanism to implement the > virtual memory management. When I look through the intel manual find that > the Segment Descriptor have a member P, when the P is set thi

Re: If I don't active the page mechanism

2012-11-02 Thread Fan Yang
Hi Mulyadi Santosa I think the OS can just use the segment mechanism to implement the virtual memory management. When I look through the intel manual find that the Segment Descriptor have a member P, when the P is set this segment is located in the physical memory otherwise the segment is not

Re: Generating list of config options present in source tree

2012-11-02 Thread Mulyadi Santosa
Hi On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Aft nix wrote: > How can I get the list of config present in a given src snapshot? not sure if this is what you want, but why not simply use : make defconfig and check the resulting .config file? -- regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consu

Building linux headers in an non-linux environment

2012-11-02 Thread Richard H Lee
I'm trying to install linux headers for cygwin using crostool-ng. ct-ng basically invokes the line: make -C /home/richard/scratch/x86linux/.build/src/linux-3.5 O=/home/richard/scratch/x86linux/.build/i386-unknown-linux-gnu/build/build-kernel-headers ARCH=x86 INSTALL_HDR_PATH=/home/richard/x-t

Re: Fwd: Memory split in 64-bit environment

2012-11-02 Thread Dmitry Filippov
Every user process in the system has its own virtual address range that extends from 0 to TASK_SIZE. The area above (from TASK_SIZE to 2^32 or 2^64 ) is reserved exclusively for the kernel — and may not be accessed by user processes. TASK_SIZE is an architecture-specific constant that divides the a

Re: Fwd: Memory split in 64-bit environment

2012-11-02 Thread Adam Lee
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:40:11PM +0530, Pritam Bankar wrote: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Mulyadi Santosa > wrote: > > Hi :) > > > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Pritam Bankar > > wrote: > >> But I have some questions, > >> > >> 1. How is memory split up on 64-bit architecture > > > > i

Fwd: Memory split in 64-bit environment

2012-11-02 Thread Pritam Bankar
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Mulyadi Santosa wrote: > Hi :) > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Pritam Bankar > wrote: >> But I have some questions, >> >> 1. How is memory split up on 64-bit architecture > > in this URL: > http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/32244/user-kernel-split-in-64bi

Generating list of config options present in source tree

2012-11-02 Thread Aft nix
How can I get the list of config present in a given src snapshot? ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

Re:

2012-11-02 Thread Mulyadi Santosa
Hi :) On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Pritam Bankar wrote: > But I have some questions, > > 1. How is memory split up on 64-bit architecture in this URL: http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/32244/user-kernel-split-in-64bit-linux it says user space get 128 TiB...the rest you can read there

[no subject]

2012-11-02 Thread Pritam Bankar
Hi, I know very well that memory on 32-bit Linux system is normally split in following way First 3GB = user space (High memory) Last 1GB = kernel space (Low memory) But I have some questions, 1. How is memory split up on 64-bit architecture 2. Can we override this 3:1 split ? 3. If yes, who can

Re: linux segment

2012-11-02 Thread Tobias Boege
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Fan Yang wrote: > 2012/10/29 Mulyadi Santosa > > > Hi Fan... > > > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Fan Yang wrote: > > > > > > [root@shell--box kernel_mod]# dmesg -c > > > ** > > > cs 60 96 > > > ds 7b 123 > > > ss 68 104 > > > es 7b 123 >

Re: kernel hangs within kernel_fpu_begin()...kernel_fpu_end()

2012-11-02 Thread Tobias Boege
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012, Digant wrote: > Hello , > I am developing a feature in a X86-64 machine running kernel 3.5.5. I am > exporting this symbol to test FPU and kernel compiles fine if I call this > symbol from my module it works great. But when I used this symbol from > scheduler particularly *enqu