Re: VLAN tagged packets received by application are corrupted

most likely you offload enabled on your card, try disabling that to see if tcpdump does the right thing for you kind regards anupam On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Amit Agarwal wrote: > Hi all, > > I have query on vlan tagged packets received by network interface. > > Problem: I have app

Re: [Eudyptula] How long have you been waiting?

i sent my task result yesterday , but lets see if i also get the reply from little by replying to your mail. :) i guess the time depends on the queue, and there has to be some human intervention in the reply, it can not be all script. On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:52 AM, karthik nayak wrote: > Hell

Re: [Eudyptula] How long have you been waiting?

Hello, As soon as Denis replied to my mail. I got my next task, cheers to Eudyptula. On Fri, Nov 21, 2014, 11:41 AM Denis Usanov wrote: > Since 10.10. 6th task. > Anyway I asked the status some weeks ago and eudyptula answered the > queue was really long. > > On 21.11.2014 08:43, karthik nayak w

Re: [Eudyptula] How long have you been waiting?

Since 10.10. 6th task. Anyway I asked the status some weeks ago and eudyptula answered the queue was really long. On 21.11.2014 08:43, karthik nayak wrote: > Hello, > As patient as I am, just wondering how long have you all been waiting > for your response. > I'm waiting for quite a while now on

[Eudyptula] How long have you been waiting?

Hello, As patient as I am, just wondering how long have you all been waiting for your response. I'm waiting for quite a while now on the 8th task. Regards, Karthik Nayak ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelne

VLAN tagged packets received by application are corrupted

Hi all, I have query on vlan tagged packets received by network interface. Problem: I have application which would receive all packets on the interface and process them ( this could be including vlan tagged packets). However when the 8021q (vlan) module is not loaded and the appropriate interface

Re:Re: Why each time of kernel compilation must be done completely?

Thank you very much for the help. It should be the fact that I changed the configuration before I make a compilation, which makes me thought that a complete compilation is inevitable. Thanks again. : ) Regards Michael At 2014-11-20 10:43:26, "Greg KH" wrote: >On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10

Re: ABI choice in adding new syscall

On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 16:44:25 -0200, Marcelo Silva Freitas said: > I am studing how to add new syscall to the kernel. > When editing the file syscall_64.tlb there are 3 choices for the ABI: 64, > common, x32 > I have read about and I don't found clearly the meaning and effect of > 'common' choice.

ABI choice in adding new syscall

Hi, I am studing how to add new syscall to the kernel. When editing the file syscall_64.tlb there are 3 choices for the ABI: 64, common, x32 I have read about and I don't found clearly the meaning and effect of 'common' choice. In what imply this choice? Thanks, Marcelo.

Re: tcp retransmission concept.

On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 21:26:32 +0530, Varun Sharma said: > Is any one know how tcp retransmission works inside kernel ? Yes, somebody understands it. :) You usually get better answers with more specific questions - do you need help in understanding the basic theory (on which case, info outside the

tcp retransmission concept.

Hi, Is any one know how tcp retransmission works inside kernel ? regards varun ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

dm-verity and backing_dev_info

Hello, I'm working on a project where I use the dm-verity data mapper on top of a regular emmc device block. The intent is that once the verity device mapper is verified successfully (top level hash verification) on top of the emmc block device and mounted to a filesystem (ext4) that the filesyste

Re:Re: work queue

Thank you for reply, Isn't this function 'create_workqueue("myfoo");' gonna create a new worker? it is expanded to "alloc_workqueue((name), WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1)" which means it is not a UNBOUND work queue. am I right? is "queue_work_on(get_cpu(), test_queue_ptr, &test_work);" gonna put the work(

Fwd: Resend - ANNOUNCE: Netdev 0.1 conference

Please forward to all places you think are relevant. [original email i sent had the wrong contact info at the bottom should be: i...@netdev01.info] Netdev 0.1 (year 0, conference 1) is a community-driven conference geared towards Linux netheads. Linux kernel networking and user space utilization