On November 24, 2014 12:28:08 PM EST, Anshuman Aggarwal
wrote:
>On 24 November 2014 at 18:49, Greg Freemyer
>wrote:
>>
>>
>> On November 24, 2014 1:48:48 AM EST, Anshuman Aggarwal
> wrote:
>>>Sandeep,
>>> This isn't exactly RAID4 (only thing in common is a single parity
>>>disk but the data is
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:58:08 +0530, Anshuman Aggarwal said:
> prevents it from directly recognized by file system code . I was
> wondering if Split RAID block devices can be made to be unaware to the
> RAID scheme on top and be fully mountable and usable without the raid
> drivers (of course inval
On 24 November 2014 at 18:49, Greg Freemyer wrote:
>
>
> On November 24, 2014 1:48:48 AM EST, Anshuman Aggarwal
> wrote:
>>Sandeep,
>> This isn't exactly RAID4 (only thing in common is a single parity
>>disk but the data is not striped at all). I did bring it up on the
>>linux-raid mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/21/2014 04:56 AM, karthik nayak wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014, 6:24 PM Sudip Mukherjee
> wrote:
>> Took 5 weeks for me on Task 05 and I got it wrong. Well it works
>> but not the way Eudyptula wants.
>
> I liked task five, that was fun. Got
Hi,allThese days i tried to study the structure task_truct in linux kernel
2.65.32,but the member of the struct is so gigantic.What' more,many materials
are just to list the struct,but not show the meaning of the members in
task_struct,and many books of kernel study also do not explian the use
On November 24, 2014 1:48:48 AM EST, Anshuman Aggarwal
wrote:
>Sandeep,
> This isn't exactly RAID4 (only thing in common is a single parity
>disk but the data is not striped at all). I did bring it up on the
>linux-raid mailing list and have had a short conversation with Neil.
>He wasn't too ex
