Yes the headers are there in the sources of 3.18.5 kernel.But then I have
to change all the references to linux/ in my modules to the
path of /include/linux/.This could be
corrective action.I am looking for preventive action .
CONFIG_LOCALVERSION appends whatever name we want to append after the
ke
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 04:48:44PM +0530, s.rawat wrote:
> thanks for the hint.A quick grep of hid-custom* or custom* inside
> Documentation
> /hid as well as drivers/iio/ doesn't yields anything related to hid custom
> sensor driver.Manual search inside the folders recursively also give the same
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 03:19:46 +0530, noyb noybee said:
> Well, any program which has root credentials is still allowed to call
> chroot(it needs to get a new passphrase before) but not any program
> with root credentials can exit it.
Well see... now you have a problem.
If you don't allow that chr
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:07 AM, wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:31:45 +0530, noyb noybee said:
>
>> I was planning that the calling process would call the new system call
>> which would return a pseudo-random key that is used as the
>> pass-phrase.
>
> So what prevents malicious code from doing
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:31:45 +0530, noyb noybee said:
> I was planning that the calling process would call the new system call
> which would return a pseudo-random key that is used as the
> pass-phrase.
So what prevents malicious code from doing a fork and then calling the
new syscall to get its
Thanks Arun for the link. This clears up things for me.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Arun KS wrote:
> Hello Roshan,
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Roshan A wrote:
>>
>> hi all,
>>
>> My question is regarding the correct use of workqueues. I have a
>> driver which queues a work item in
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:29 AM, wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 03:42:50 +0530, noyb noybee said:
> You missed the point. How does the process *securely* get the passphrase
> that will be passed into the syscall? (Hint - a keystroke logger is only
> the *start* of your problems. Think about why t
Is it true that _every_ PCI or PCI Express device supporting MSI is
indicated by some mention of MSI in "lspci -v", and if there's no such
mention, it surely doesn't support MSI?
--
Andrey Utkin
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbie
On 11-Feb-2015, at 11:18 pm, VinÃcius Tinti wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:42 PM, s.rawat wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I recently built the 3.18.5 kernel according to instruction on the
>> linuxkernel newbie page .I used /sbin/installkernel script to install the
>> modules and updated the grub.cnf.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:42 PM, s.rawat wrote:
> Hello,
> I recently built the 3.18.5 kernel according to instruction on the
> linuxkernel newbie page .I used /sbin/installkernel script to install the
> modules and updated the grub.cnf.
> On a reboot i get option 3.18.5[b]-custom[/b] and booted i
Hello,
I recently built the 3.18.5 kernel according to instruction on the
linuxkernel newbie page .I used /sbin/installkernel script to install the
modules and updated the grub.cnf.
On a reboot i get option 3.18.5[b]-custom[/b] and booted in.But now since I
am modifying the kernel and needed header
Hi Tsahee,
Am 09.02.2015 um 09:22 schrieb Tsahee Zidenberg:
> syscon regmap is one possible way to access a register file from two
> different drivers without mapping it twice. But in that case you loose
> the name-per-register in devicetree. The devtree maps the general
> regfile, and the drivers
Hello Valdis
Sorry for such a late reply and thank you for such a quick reply.
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 12:12 -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:45:30 +0800, Brock York said:
>
> (Note, I don't have an Acer, nor am I an HID expert... so take this
> all with a grain of s
Hello Roshan,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Roshan A wrote:
>
> hi all,
>
> My question is regarding the correct use of workqueues. I have a
> driver which queues a work item in the interrupt handler. The bottom
> half function ( the workitem -function ) does have proper locking (
> mutex ) in
Hi,
I have few laptops and two routers with dual band (TP-LINK TL-WDR3600 N600
WIRELESS DUAL BAND GIGABIT ROUTER) .
What i am trying to achieve is if someone want to send msg to a an
individual then one of the band should be used (eg 2.4GHz) and if someone
want to send message to the group then i
thanks for the hint.A quick grep of hid-custom* or custom* inside
Documentation/hid as well as drivers/iio/ doesn't yields anything related
to hid custom sensor driver.Manual search inside the folders recursively
also give the same result.I did this for kernel 3.18.x and 3.19.x.I
inspired to find t
16 matches
Mail list logo
