On Fri, 04 Mar 2016 13:02:02 +0800, Navy Cheng said:
> Hi,
>
> When I read the code of list_del(), I find LIST_POISON1 and LIST_POISON2:
>
> static inline void list_del(struct list_head *entry)
> {
> __list_del(entry->prev, entry->next);
> entry->next = LIST_POISON1;
> ent
Hi,
When I read the code of list_del(), I find LIST_POISON1 and LIST_POISON2:
static inline void list_del(struct list_head *entry)
{
__list_del(entry->prev, entry->next);
entry->next = LIST_POISON1;
entry->prev = LIST_POISON2;
}
Why not set entry->next and ent
Hi,
Would you be able to add me to the wiki edit list? Let me know if you need
any specific info.
--
Roberto Caballero
Electrical Engineer
Embedded System Specialist
(647) 234 - 0179
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
http:/
Hello,
Completely Fair Scheduler uses group Scheduling. That is every
process gets an equal share of CPU time no matter how many threads are
there.
How to measure that CFS uses Group Scheduling Feature. Which
performance tools like time, vmstat will help to prove this.
Regards,
Suniita
__
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Nitin Varyani
wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to migrate user context of a process to a remote machine
> (i.e. registers, code, data, virtual memory and program counter) and when
> it makes a system call or file i/o, I want to send that request to its home
> node.
>
>
Hi,
I want to migrate user context of a process to a remote machine (i.e.
registers, code, data, virtual memory and program counter) and when it
makes a system call or file i/o, I want to send that request to its home
node.
That is, the user process executing at remote node will copy desired