Re: IRC channel for linux-block layer and linux-mmc discussion

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 04:53:02PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote: > Guys, > Can someone please tell IRC channel & server for discussion on > linux-block layer and linux-mmc discussion? What's wrong with the mailing lists for those portions of the kernel instead?

IRC channel for linux-block layer and linux-mmc discussion

Guys, Can someone please tell IRC channel & server for discussion on linux-block layer and linux-mmc discussion? Regards Ritesh ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

make oldconfig forces HWMON to be inbuilt

Hi guys : I am seeing this weird issue where even though my original kernel configuration tries to build HWMON as a module, when I do 'make oldconfig', it forces HWMON to be built into the kernel. Is there anyway I can find what configuration is forcing this change? CONFIG_HWMEM is a tristate

Request for guidance

Hi All, I am an Embedded Software Engineer with 3+ years of experience. I am fascinated by kernel development and want to be a device driver developer. I have done following so far. #Studied LDD3. #Subscribed to eudyptula challenge and submitted solution for 4th task(waiting for next task).

Re: USB device debugging

Greg KH writes: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 01:48:16PM +0530, Narasimha M wrote: >> Thanks for the information. But i want to know the flow of receive >> packet from usb driver to linux stack. I am facing an issue that >> corrupted data is coming to usbnet_bh function. So i want to

Re: Changing the default scheduler

(Sorry I forgot to Cc kernelnewbies, I fixed the Cc line). On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:47:37AM +, Renato Utsch wrote: > Hi Frederic, > > Thanks, this was exactly what I was looking for! I was suspecting that all > the processes would inherit the policy of the init process, but I didn't > know

Re: Request for guidance

On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:17 AM, sanjeev sharma wrote: > Hi Abhishek, > > There are some open source project where you can contribute too but I > would suggest first you to work on Kernel Bugs available at > https://bugzilla.kernel.org. This would boost your confidence. Thanks Sanjeev. Is there

Re: USB device debugging

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 01:48:16PM +0530, Narasimha M wrote: > Thanks for the information. But i want to know the flow of receive > packet from usb driver to linux stack. I am facing an issue that > corrupted data is coming to usbnet_bh function. So i want to know > about the place where we

Re: Changing the default scheduler

Yes, I've managed to go this far. My problem is discovering where to change on the code to change the default scheduler. It is my first time trying to understand the linux sources, and I couldn't find much updated info online. Em Ter, 24 de mai de 2016 3:04 AM, Mulyadi Santosa <

Re: USB device debugging

Thanks for the information. But i want to know the flow of receive packet from usb driver to linux stack. I am facing an issue that corrupted data is coming to usbnet_bh function. So i want to know about the place where we generate the data in usb driver and sent it to usbnet. Could you please

Re: USB device debugging

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Narasimha M wrote: > Hi All, > Could you please help in checking receive packet flow from USB driver. https://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureSetup/USB -- Carlo Caione ___ Kernelnewbies mailing

USB device debugging

Hi All, Could you please help in checking receive packet flow from USB driver. ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

Re: Changing the default scheduler

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Renato Utsch wrote: > The idea is to patch the kernel. I am trying to discover how I can set the > default scheduler for new processes, so that I can test the behavior of any > schedulers that I may write. Do you have any ideas? > > Em Seg,