On Fri, 27 May 2016, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:08:09PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > continuing down this road of exporting kernel headers, under
> > include/uapi/ (and mostly further under linux/), there's still a *ton*
> > of testing of the __KERNEL__ preprocessor ch
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:08:09PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> continuing down this road of exporting kernel headers, under
> include/uapi/ (and mostly further under linux/), there's still a *ton*
> of testing of the __KERNEL__ preprocessor check.
>
> now, i realize that when one does
On Fri, 27 May 2016, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 08:07:17AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > next question about exporting kernel headers, this one related to
> > the content placed under include/uapi/.
> >
> > is there any rationale for header files to be living under
> > i
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 08:07:17AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> next question about exporting kernel headers, this one related to
> the content placed under include/uapi/.
>
> is there any rationale for header files to be living under
> include/uapi/ if they're not listed in the corresp
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 07:53:00AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> for various reasons, i'm poring over the grotty details of the
> installation of kernel headers, so a couple questions before i get any
> further into the code.
>
> first, is there any value to a Kbuild file with no content
continuing down this road of exporting kernel headers, under
include/uapi/ (and mostly further under linux/), there's still a *ton*
of testing of the __KERNEL__ preprocessor check.
now, i realize that when one does "make headers_install", all those
files are run through "unifdef" to sanitize
On Fri, 27 May 2016, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> "Robert P. J. Day" writes:
>
> > while i'm here, some pedantry ... what is the point of adding a
> > header file somewhere under include/uapi/ without
> > *immediately* adding it to the Kbuild file so that it's exported?
>
> I don't know the answer to th
Hi Greg,
Nothing wrong, I was looking if we have such channel(in case I am not
aware of) for any quick discussion of some topic/queries.
But ya, mailing list could be used as well.
Thanks
Ritesh
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 04:53:02PM +0530, Ritesh H
"Robert P. J. Day" writes:
> while i'm here, some pedantry ... what is the point of adding a
> header file somewhere under include/uapi/ without
> *immediately* adding it to the Kbuild file so that it's exported?
I don't know the answer to that. But having done this once, I can
answer why *I*
On Fri, 27 May 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> next question about exporting kernel headers, this one related to
> the content placed under include/uapi/.
>
> is there any rationale for header files to be living under
> include/uapi/ if they're not listed in the corresponding
> Kbuild file for
next question about exporting kernel headers, this one related to
the content placed under include/uapi/.
is there any rationale for header files to be living under
include/uapi/ if they're not listed in the corresponding
Kbuild file for export?
for example, in include/uapi/drm, there are
for various reasons, i'm poring over the grotty details of the
installation of kernel headers, so a couple questions before i get any
further into the code.
first, is there any value to a Kbuild file with no content? for
example, here's the entirety of
arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/Kbuild:
12 matches
Mail list logo