On 11/18/2017 11:50 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:12 PM, ayaka wrote:
>> #if 1
>> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>> u32 *cur = (u32 *)buffer;
>> u32 pos = offset + i * 4;
>>
>> cur += i;
>> mp
On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 14:09:31 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour said:
> Only whitelisted system calls would be allowed, such as open(), read(),
> and write(). Async getuid() would not be allowed. Nor would async
> exit() or exit_group().
You missed the point - If you allow async calls, you need to deal
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 01:44:44PM -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 13:15:27 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour said:
>
> > However, the ioctl I actually want to implement (see above) does the
> > system call asynchronously. That isn???t possible using the existing
> > APIs.
>
On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 13:15:27 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour said:
> However, the ioctl I actually want to implement (see above) does the
> system call asynchronously. That isnât possible using the existing
> APIs.
Ever consider that it's because there's no clear semantics to what
executing an arbit
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:54:24AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 09:16:35PM -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > I am looking to write my first driver. This driver will create a single
> > character device, which can be opened by any user. The device will
> > support one ioctl:
Hello All:
I am writing a driver, I need to write a series of values into the
registers. The old code use the writel_relaxed() to avoid flushing cache
between echo of register. I want to use the recommended way of the io
operations, so I choose the iowrite32()_req(), but I found what it wrot
Hello
I am writing a driver to operation with the dma-buf, a problem I meet
is that a dma-buf maybe closed by the other driver or userspace
application, then the same number of the file descriptor will be
assigned with the other thing, its private data is different. I watch
what the drm sys
Linus Torvalds writes:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
>>
>> Linus do you care what protocol? I'm patching Documentation and since
>> the point is creating pull requests for you 'some people' don't matter.
>
> I actually tend to prefer the regular git:// protocol and s
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:12 PM, ayaka wrote:
> #if 1
> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> u32 *cur = (u32 *)buffer;
> u32 pos = offset + i * 4;
>
> cur += i;
> mpp_debug(DEBUG_SET_REG, "write reg[%03d]: %08x\n",
> pos, *cu
[...]
>
> An example pull request of mine might look like:
> Char/Misc patches for 4.15-rc1
>
> Here is the big char/misc patch set for the 4.15-rc1 merge
> window. Contained in here is the normal set of new functions
> added to all of these crazy drivers, as well
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 01:07:30PM +0100, Fabian Baumanis wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> this morning i created my first patch for the Linux kernel.
> It fixes a style issue which was reported by using checkpatch.pl on
> drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/adl_pci9118.c
>
> Although it's a very small patch, i
Hi there,
this morning i created my first patch for the Linux kernel.
It fixes a style issue which was reported by using checkpatch.pl on
drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/adl_pci9118.c
Although it's a very small patch, i hope this is useful.
My question now is: how can i submit the patch to the
12 matches
Mail list logo
