On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:54:27PM +0530, Muni Sekhar wrote:
> We use out-of-tree kernel modules in our project and I need to measure the
> performance of it by using a bit older gcc version 4.8.5.
You are really on your own here, sorry. Please use a modern version of
gcc, and then go complain to
On Tue, 9 Jul, 2019, 11:16 PM Denis Kirjanov, wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 9, 2019, Muni Sekhar wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 10:56 PM Denis Kirjanov
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tuesday, July 9, 2019, Muni Sekhar wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> My Kernel is built with t
On Tuesday, July 9, 2019, Muni Sekhar wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 10:56 PM Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, July 9, 2019, Muni Sekhar wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >>
> >> My Kernel is built with the following options:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR=y
> >>
>
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 10:56 PM Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 9, 2019, Muni Sekhar wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> My Kernel is built with the following options:
>>
>>
>>
>> CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR=y
>>
>> CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> We use out-of-tree kern
On Tuesday, July 9, 2019, Muni Sekhar wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> My Kernel is built with the following options:
>
>
>
> CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR=y
>
> CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y
>
>
>
>
>
> We use out-of-tree kernel modules in our project and I need to measure the
> performance of it by using
Hi All,
My Kernel is built with the following options:
CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR=y
CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y
We use out-of-tree kernel modules in our project and I need to measure the
performance of it by using a bit older gcc version 4.8.5.
I can build the modules with gcc abo
