On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:06:10PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:56:40PM +0300, Doron Behar wrote:
> > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 12:45:55PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 01:26:35PM +0300, Doron Behar wrote:
> > > > I hope this question fits to this List.
> >
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 04:40:00PM +0200, Dávid Virág wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:16 PM Ezra Buehler wrote:
>
> > As far as I know they don't like that.
> >
> I see, thanks for the reply!
>
> Sorry for the double reply, I'm new to mailing lists, and forgot to CC
> kernelnewbies.
> If those
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:16 PM Ezra Buehler wrote:
> As far as I know they don't like that.
>
I see, thanks for the reply!
Sorry for the double reply, I'm new to mailing lists, and forgot to CC
kernelnewbies.
If those wouldn't be merged, would drivers for the SOC/Phone be merged
without the DTS/
On 4 May 2020, at 15:51, Dávid Virág wrote:
>
> My question is this: Would DTSIs for it's SOC, and its components be merged
> without any DTS actually including them?
As far as I know they don't like that.
Cheers,
Ezra.
___
Kernelnewbies mailing l
Hi,
I have an Android phone that I'd like to see running on the mainline kernel
one day. Currently it runs a downstream 4.4 kernel. Since the stock (closed
source) bootloader on the phone only really checks the SOC in a property in
the DTBs but not the model of the phone, I'm sure a DTS for the ph
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:56:40PM +0300, Doron Behar wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 12:45:55PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 01:26:35PM +0300, Doron Behar wrote:
> > > I hope this question fits to this List.
> > >
> > > Today I learned that my distro's `linux-unfree-firmware
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 06:14:59PM +0530, Majji SankaraRao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got the following kernel message after inserting my sample char dev
> module into kernel version - 5.3.0-51-generic
>
> *[17866.747927] mychardev: module verification failed: signature and/or
> required key missing - ta
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 12:45:55PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 01:26:35PM +0300, Doron Behar wrote:
> > I hope this question fits to this List.
> >
> > Today I learned that my distro's `linux-unfree-firmware` package is 491
> > Mb in size. I'm pretty sure my hardware doesn't ne
Hi,
I got the following kernel message after inserting my sample char dev
module into kernel version - 5.3.0-51-generic
*[17866.747927] mychardev: module verification failed: signature and/or
required key missing - tainting kernel*
Please guide me how to solve this issue.
Thanks in advance,
San
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 01:26:35PM +0300, Doron Behar wrote:
> I hope this question fits to this List.
>
> Today I learned that my distro's `linux-unfree-firmware` package is 491
> Mb in size. I'm pretty sure my hardware doesn't need all of these files.
> Maybe different Linux distros call this pa
I hope this question fits to this List.
Today I learned that my distro's `linux-unfree-firmware` package is 491
Mb in size. I'm pretty sure my hardware doesn't need all of these files.
Maybe different Linux distros call this package differently, but I'm talking
about the firmware files that come f
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 02:07:06PM +0530, Majji SankaraRao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please suggest some IDE's to Linux code navigation and development
> if possible.
Any one you want to use should be fine. Pick your favorite one and go
at it.
Remember, there are not specific requirements to use an IDE
Hi,
Please suggest some IDE's to Linux code navigation and development
if possible.
Thanks in advance,
Sankara Rao Majji
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 10:49 AM Majji SankaraRao <
sankar.linux.developm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Valdis,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> With your suggestions I have used th
13 matches
Mail list logo
