On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:49:51AM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i am preparing my first patch.
> May i ask for review and advise how to make it acceptable ?
If you are not running it already you can catch common mistakes by
running checkpatch script from the kernel source top directory
$ git fetch linux-next
> ...
> * [new branch]akpm -> linux-next/akpm
> * [new branch]akpm-base -> linux-next/akpm-base
> * [new branch]master-> linux-next/master
> * [new branch] p
[ Please keep me in CC as I'm not subscribed to the list]
Hi all,
I have an application which finds the data rate over the PCIe
interface. I’m getting the lesser data rate in one of my Linux X86
systems.
When I change the scaling_governor from "powersave" to "performance"
mode for each CPU, then
master-> linux-next/master
* [new branch]pending-fixes -> linux-next/pending-fixes
* [new branch]stable-> linux-next/stable
* [new tag] next-20200827 -> next-20200827
$ git checkout master
...
$ gi
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:02:21AM -0400, Leam Hall wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:20 AM Greg KH wrote:
>
> > That is also documented in the ever-growing submitting patches document
> > somewhere...
>
> This?
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html
That's
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:20 AM Greg KH wrote:
> That is also documented in the ever-growing submitting patches document
> somewhere...
This?
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kerneln
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:52:56AM +0200, Garrit Franke wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Noob here.
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:49 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> >
> > Commit 210ba1d1724f5c4ed87a2ab1a21ca861a915f734 of january 2008 switched
> > sr_drive_status() away from indirectly using sr_do_ioctl() fo
Hi all,
As the title mentions, I cannot boot Linux kernel 2.6.35 or 2.6.24 with QEMU
5.1 on Arch Linux. QEMU hasn’t any output when running.
Environment:
OS: Arch Linux 5.8.1-arch1-1
GCC: 5.5.0, installed from AUR.
QEMU: qemu-headless 5.1.0-1
Architecture: x86_64
Hi Thomas,
Noob here.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:49 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> Commit 210ba1d1724f5c4ed87a2ab1a21ca861a915f734 of january 2008 switched
> sr_drive_status() away from indirectly using sr_do_ioctl() for sending
> TEST UNIT READY commands. sr_do_ioctl() has a wait-and-retry loop f
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i am preparing my first patch.
> May i ask for review and advise how to make it acceptable ?
>
> The patch shall fix an old regression of cdrom and sr drivers.
> Although drivers/cdrom has no mailing list entry in MAINTAINERS, i
Hi,
i am preparing my first patch.
May i ask for review and advise how to make it acceptable ?
The patch shall fix an old regression of cdrom and sr drivers.
Although drivers/cdrom has no mailing list entry in MAINTAINERS, i assume
that such patches should go to linux-s...@vger.kernel.org which i
11 matches
Mail list logo