load_percpu_segment, which is called by switch_to_new_gdt in
setup_per_cpu_areas.
-daveti
> On Apr 23, 2016, at 3:24 AM, wrote:
>
> Hi all:
> I knew the kernel implement the per-cpu variable via __percpu_seg. For
> example on x86 architecture, it's defined as:
>
>
This ‘P’ is used to make gcc happy and work.
Without ‘P’, this inline would be interpreted as:
leal $-512(%esp), %eax
With ‘P’, this inline is the thing we really want:
leal -512(%esp), %eax
Eventually, my gcc 4.9.2 does not compile with ‘P’ is missing. I am not sure if
this is still the case
addr2line -e /path_to_vmlinux c069369c
-daveti
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 1:14 PM, Matwey V. Kornilov
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have the following stack trace:
>
> [ 1351.381696] a.out S c0afb050 0 1676 1658 0x
> [ 1351.387048] [] (__schedule)
Off the topic maybe, this usb redirector could be built above usbip, which is
in the mainline.
-daveti
On Jul 21, 2015, at 3:05 PM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 03:49:22PM -0300, Lucas Tanure wrote:
Hi,
This company released a obfuscated kernel module in GPL
LSM should not appear in modprobe as they are not loaded anymore. Am
I missing something or is this correct?
Thanks,
Thomas
On Mon Jan 19 2015 at 3:45:15 PM Dave Tian dave.jing.t...@gmail.com
mailto:dave.jing.t...@gmail.com wrote:
LSM does not support dynamic module loading now.
I
Check arp_* fields in
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
-daveti
On Jan 19, 2015, at 7:11 PM, Mike Krinkin krinkin@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 03:42:58PM -0800, Mandeep
What about arp_filter=0 arp_ignore=0?
-daveti
On Jan 19, 2015, at 9:14 PM, Mandeep Sandhu mandeepsandhu@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's how my current setup looks like:
$ ifconfig eth4
eth4 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 74:fe:48:04:e7:eb
inet addr:192.168.1.1
LSM does not support dynamic module loading now.
I have tried to create a new LSM based on yama and boot it as the default on my
Ubuntu 14.04 (kernel 3.13). It works smoothly. I have NOT tried Fedora with
kernel 3.18 yet but I do not think there would be some changes breaking LSM,
which has
Did SELinux get loaded before your changes (Fedora uses SELinux by default)?
Would you please post your security config? I still suspect that there was sth
messed up in the config.
Thanks,
Dave
On Jan 18, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Thomas F. J.-M. Pasquier tfj...@cam.ac.uk
wrote:
No, other LSM.
If you have to wait for the IRQ to be finished, do NOT use work queue, which
belongs to bottom half. Just write your own IRQ handler, do sth there and
register your handler.
-daveti
On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Victor Ascroft victorascr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is it ok to use
Thanks, Tom~ Fun to read and ask.
-daveti
On Dec 2, 2014, at 4:25 AM, Thomas t...@homeostasie.eu wrote:
I know Greg K.H. used this mailing list.
Maybe not everybody frequent reddit intensively.
Greg Kroah-Hartman is doing an Ask Me Anything on reddit :
A chance to asked more personal
Latest kernel provides a TCP SYN Cookie feature to defense from SYN flooding.
-daveti
On Nov 6, 2014, at 11:58 PM, Silvan Jegen m...@sillymon.ch wrote:
2014-11-06 16:15,Puneet Agarwal:
Is there a way to check the reason, why they do not answer to the
SYN-ACK's?
I don't think so. After
Oops, my bad. I remember seeing sth on LWN for the 3.x kernel talking about a
new feature related with TCP SYN. Thought this pretty old stuff was the one…
-daveti
On Nov 8, 2014, at 12:58 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 23:49:35 +0800, Dave Tian said:
Latest kernel
The simple answer would be we do not want to be interrupted during a interrupt
handler. For SMP, there are other CPUs which can respond to IRQs.
-daveti
On Nov 2, 2014, at 2:30 PM, mind entropy mindentr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
When I do spin_lock_irq it disables IRQ's which were
If you are talking about the same spin_lock, once it is locked, it is locked.
Others (even from other CPUs) have to ‘spin' util the lock is freed.
-daveti
On Oct 24, 2014, at 11:04 PM, Oscar Salvador osalvador.vilard...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
I have a doubt about interrupts and spin
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Dave Tian dave.jing.t...@gmail.com wrote:
It also works as value is surrounded by (), though I do not think the patch
itself is right or useful.
Dave Tian
dave.jing.t...@gmail.com
On Oct 11, 2014, at 12:58 PM, Sudip Mukherjee sudipm.mukher
It also works as value is surrounded by (), though I do not think the patch
itself is right or useful.
Dave Tian
dave.jing.t...@gmail.com
On Oct 11, 2014, at 12:58 PM, Sudip Mukherjee sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 09:55:48PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
Fixes
Hi,
Can someone point me to the implementation of MPI_WSIZE()? I assume it should
be some old macro under linux/mpi.h. However, I am not able to find it within
linux/crypto/mpi.h under RH kernel 2.6.32-358 or in the latest 3.x kernel.
Thanks,
Dave
, // type
0, // value
0, // index
buf,// recv buf
1, // size
10*HZ); // timeout
Thanks,
Dave Tian
dave.jing.t...@gmail.com
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
http
arp_filter may fit better.
0 - (default) The kernel can respond to arp requests with addresses
from other interfaces. This may seem wrong but it usually makes
sense, because it increases the chance of successful communication.
IP addresses are owned by the complete
I tried to join and got no response yet…
Is that site still alive/maintained?
-daveti
On Jun 26, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Lucas Tanure tan...@linux.com wrote:
Sorry to bug this again.
I'm waiting for task 06 more than 9 days. There are more guys with the same
delay time in this task ?
Thanks
Thanks for letting me know~ Will wait for the response then…
-daveti
On Jun 26, 2014, at 2:35 PM, Fernando Apesteguía
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Dave Tian dave.jing.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to join and got no response yet…
Is that site
22 matches
Mail list logo