Re: [PATCH] drivers: pnp: proc.c: Handle errors while attaching devices

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 12:31:13AM -0400, Valdis Klētnieks wrote: > On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:26:27 +0300, Leon Romanovsky said: > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:20:32PM +0530, bkkarthik wrote: > > > These were only intended for a clean-up job, the idea of this function > > >

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark isapnp as obsolete

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 02:17:00PM +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > Dne 28. 04. 21 v 13:11 Greg KH napsal(a): > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 04:35:36PM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote: > >> isapnp code is very old and according to this link > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legacy_Plug_and_Play#Specifica

Re: [PATCH] drivers: pnp: proc.c: Handle errors while attaching devices

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 02:04:49PM +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > Dne 26. 04. 21 v 19:50 bkkarthik napsal(a): > > On 21/04/26 08:04AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 01:13:01AM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote: > >>> isapnp_proc_init() does not

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark isapnp as obsolete

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 05:43:29PM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote: > On 21/04/28 02:48PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 05:10:57PM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote: > > > On 21/04/28 01:11PM, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 04:35:36P

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark isapnp as obsolete

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 05:10:57PM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote: > On 21/04/28 01:11PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 04:35:36PM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote: > > > isapnp code is very old and according to this link > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legacy_Plug_and_Play#Specification

Re: [PATCH] drivers: pnp: proc.c: Handle errors while attaching devices

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:20:32PM +0530, bkkarthik wrote: > On 21/04/26 08:04AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 01:13:01AM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote: > > > isapnp_proc_init() does not look at the return value from > > > isapnp_proc_attach_devi

Re: [PATCH] drivers: pnp: proc.c: Removed unnecessary varibles

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:22:54PM +0530, bkkarthik wrote: > On 21/04/26 03:50PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:00:58PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 6:57 AM Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH] drivers: pnp: proc.c: Removed unnecessary varibles

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:00:58PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 6:57 AM Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 03:08:03PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > On 4/22/21 12:03 PM, Anupama K Patil wrote: > > > > de, e a

Re: [PATCH] drivers: pnp: proc.c: Handle errors while attaching devices

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 01:13:01AM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote: > isapnp_proc_init() does not look at the return value from > isapnp_proc_attach_device(). Check for this return value in > isapnp_proc_detach_device(). > > Cleanup in isapnp_proc_detach_device and > isapnp_proc_detach_bus() for clea

Re: [PATCH] drivers: pnp: proc.c: Removed unnecessary varibles

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 03:08:03PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 4/22/21 12:03 PM, Anupama K Patil wrote: > > de, e are two variables of the type 'struct proc_dir_entry' > > which can be removed to save memory. This also fixes a coding style > > issue reported by checkpatch where we are suggested t

Re: Confused about which branch to patch against

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 09:39:41PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Hi, > > On 9/22/20 21:08, James Browning wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > After reading through the kernel documentation about submitting pathces, > > and reading through the kernel newbies guide to submitting patches, I > > still hav

Re: Divide Error: 0000 [#1] SMP

ero" [1] will fix your issue. It is for 4.1 kernel. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/21/797 -- Leon Romanovsky | Independent Linux Consultant www.leon.nu | l...@leon.nu ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org h

Re: Question on checpatch.pl warning -- possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message.

kind regards, > > Bas Peters > > > > ___ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org > http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies -- Leon Romanovsky | Independent Linux Consultant www.leon.nu | l...@leon.nu _

Re: Page fault in kernel code

nel simply copy the page table entry from master page table to > > the current process' page table and fix the page fault. > > MH Thanks, I was under wrong impression that the difference between page allocated in kmalloc vs. vmalloc is in PTE mapping. > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at

Re: Page fault in kernel code

loc handle this? Pages allocated via vmalloc call won't generate page-faults. > > > _______ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org > http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies > -- Leon Ro

Re: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

dIn Corporation. 2029 > Stierlin Ct. Mountain View, CA 94043, USA > > , > > ___ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org > http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies > > > ___

Re: Joining the development

ernelnewbies.org > http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies -- Leon Romanovsky | Independent Linux Consultant         www.leon.nu | l...@leon.nu ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies