Thanks Valdis. Seems like a d'oh moment now. Never thought of scanning
through the git history for checkpatch . Good tip.
Thanks and regards
Yogesh
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:02 AM wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 13:05:37 +0530, Yogesh Chaudhari said:
>
> > However, is there a plac
On 26 July 2015 at 03:42, Greg KH wrote:
> No, that would be two different things. Do the bug fix first, and then
> the cleanup on a different patch. And even then, most maintainers will
> not take a cleanup patch. Stick with subsystems that do take these
> types of fixes if you want/like to d
The short answer:
use pr_debug instead of printk.
The long answer:
(This is the answer I got from stackoverflow question that I had
asked for similar question I was having:)
Each kernel subsystem usually has its own printk format. So when you
are using network subsystem, you have to use netdev_
