On 06/02/2011 05:41 AM, mani wrote:
Dear All,
Any suggestions on the below point ?
have you tried different benchmarks?
This can give you an idea of the impact. It seems that up to now, you've
only executed sequential read and write access by one process.
Personally I use the fio benchmark.
Dear All,
Any suggestions on the below point ?
Thanks in advance..
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:53 AM, mani wrote:
> Dear Eduardo,
>
>I am using squashfs filesystem. So i am more concern with the read
> speed.
> whereas below are the details
>
Dear Eduardo,
I am using squashfs filesystem. So i am more concern with the read speed.
whereas below are the details
read speed write
speed
ELEVATOR_INSERT_SORT 8 MBps5MBps
ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK 10 MBps
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:29 AM, mani wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I am working on linux kernel 2.6.32.9 tegra NVIDIA board.
>
> I am getting ~8MBps speed of the Nand disk if i use hdparm
> hdparm -t /dev/mtdblock3
>
> i made changes in block layer of kernel as below:-
>
> block/blk-core.c
> static in
Dear All,
I am working on linux kernel 2.6.32.9 tegra NVIDIA board.
I am getting ~8MBps speed of the Nand disk if i use hdparm
hdparm -t /dev/mtdblock3
i made changes in block layer of kernel as below:-
block/blk-core.c
static inline void add_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req
