Hi!
[ also Cc: the email address on the top on the test case. Therefore
self-quoting for the rest of the thread. ]
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 09:51 +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 10:30 +0800, K K wrote:
> []
> > I am doing POSIX test on linux. And for mq_timedreceive() in
Hi Bernd,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:07 AM, K K wrote:
> Hi Bernd,
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Bernd Petrovitsch <
> be...@petrovitsch.priv.at> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 10:30 +0800, K K wrote:
>> []
>> > I am doing POSIX test on linux. And for mq_timedreceive()
Hi Bernd,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Bernd Petrovitsch <
be...@petrovitsch.priv.at> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 10:30 +0800, K K wrote:
> []
> > I am doing POSIX test on linux. And for mq_timedreceive() in POSIX spec
> > 2008 Issue 7, Line 43787:
> >
> > The validity of the
Hi!
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 10:30 +0800, K K wrote:
[]
> I am doing POSIX test on linux. And for mq_timedreceive() in POSIX spec
> 2008 Issue 7, Line 43787:
>
> The validity of the abstime parameter need not be checked if a
> message can be removed from the message queue immediately.
>
> B
Hi All,
I am doing POSIX test on linux. And for mq_timedreceive() in POSIX spec
2008 Issue 7, Line 43787:
The validity of the abstime parameter need not be checked if a
message can be removed from the message queue immediately.
But when I run test case mq_timedreceive/10-2 of POSIX suite (ca
