RE: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung

2015-01-29 Thread Giridhara RP (grp)
All, I Changed CONFIG_NR_CPUS=64 to CONFIG_NR_CPUS=128 and kernel did not panic. Please note my setup has 4CPUs , each has 10 cores and supports Hyper threading. So, linux creates 4 x 10 x 2 logical CPUs. Thanks Giri ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kern

RE: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung

2015-01-27 Thread Giridhara RP (grp)
Thanks Greg, Giri ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

Re: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung

2015-01-27 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 03:52:05AM +, Giridhara RP (grp) wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Thanks for the quick turnaround. Which is the stable version? Kernel > 2.6.32.60 was used in RHEL 6.2 and we thought this kernel version is > stable. What do you mean by "stable"? Yes, it is "stable" if you have h

Re: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung

2015-01-27 Thread Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 09:25:04AM +0100, Jan Niggemann wrote: > Zitat von Anand Moon : > > http://ark.intel.com/products/64622/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5-4650-20M-Cache-2_70-GHz-8_00-GTs-Intel-QPI > > > > Show it has only 8 core of CPU. Why are you setting the CONFIG_NR_CPUS=64. > > certainly it will

Re: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung

2015-01-27 Thread Jan Niggemann
Zitat von Anand Moon : > http://ark.intel.com/products/64622/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5-4650-20M-Cache-2_70-GHz-8_00-GTs-Intel-QPI > > Show it has only 8 core of CPU. Why are you setting the CONFIG_NR_CPUS=64. > certainly it will have a issue in the kernel. Why would that lead to issues? AFAIK all it

RE: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung

2015-01-27 Thread Giridhara RP (grp)
-Original Message- From: Anand Moon [mailto:moon.li...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 12:30 PM To: Giridhara RP (grp); valdis.kletni...@vt.edu Cc: Greg KH; kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung Hi Giridhara, http://ark.intel.com

Re: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung

2015-01-26 Thread Anand Moon
, Giridhara RP (grp) wrote: -Original Message- From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:15 AM To: Giridhara RP (grp) Cc: Greg KH; kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 04:06

RE: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung

2015-01-26 Thread Giridhara RP (grp)
-Original Message- From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:15 AM To: Giridhara RP (grp) Cc: Greg KH; kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 04:06:00 +, "Giridha

Re: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung

2015-01-26 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 04:06:00 +, "Giridhara RP (grp)" said: > Which kernel version should I use to solve this crash/panic? That will depend on exactly why you're still running a 2.6.32 kernel from 6 years ago. Remember - the fact it's all the way up to 2.6.32.65 doesn't mean you have all the b

RE: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung

2015-01-26 Thread Giridhara RP (grp)
-Original Message- From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 9:32 AM To: Giridhara RP (grp) Cc: Greg KH; kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 03:52:05 +, "Giridha

Re: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung

2015-01-26 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 03:52:05 +, "Giridhara RP (grp)" said: > Thanks for the quick turnaround. Which is the stable version? Kernel > 2.6.32.60 was used in RHEL 6.2 and we thought this kernel version is stable. It's stable enough that RedHat can afford to keep supporting its paying customers.

RE: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung

2015-01-26 Thread Giridhara RP (grp)
(grp) Cc: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:06:56AM +, Giridhara RP (grp) wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am facing crash/hang with 2.6.32.60 Kernel (64bit). Note this is a _very_ old and obsolete kernel, plea

Re: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung

2015-01-26 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:06:56AM +, Giridhara RP (grp) wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am facing crash/hang with 2.6.32.60 Kernel (64bit). Note this is a _very_ old and obsolete kernel, please use a modern kernel release if you wish to get help from the community. If you are being forced to use

RE: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung

2015-01-26 Thread Giridhara RP (grp)
Hello, Please note my CPU is this. Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4650 v2 @ 2.40GHz stepping 04 From: Giridhara RP (grp) Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 5:37 AM To: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org Subject: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung Hi, I am facing crash/hang with 2.6.32.60 Kernel (64bit). My

Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung

2015-01-26 Thread Giridhara RP (grp)
Hi, I am facing crash/hang with 2.6.32.60 Kernel (64bit). My maxcpus (CONFIG_NR_CPUS) count is 64 and below is the call trace. I see log saying "BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#74". Is it a known bug? If its fixed let me know the patch. Any pointers really appreciated. Please note, if I change