Hi Vaibhav,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
> Hi Dave, Santhosh,
>
> Thanks for the reply! I was talking about the following paragraph from the
> reference you provided :
>
> The kernel (on the x86 architecture, in the default configuration) splits
> the 4-GB virtual address
Hi Dave, Santhosh,
Thanks for the reply! I was talking about the following paragraph from the
reference you provided :
The kernel (on the x86 architecture, in the default configuration) splits
the 4-GB virtual address space between user-space and the kernel; the same
set of mappings is used in bo
hi,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I read a few articles on linux virtual memory management such as this one :
> http://lwn.net/Articles/75174/
>
> which say that earlier linux kernel could only use memory slightly below 1
> GB. They have
In Linux to separate the u
Hi Vaibhav,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I read a few articles on linux virtual memory management such as this one :
> http://lwn.net/Articles/75174/
>
> which say that earlier linux kernel could only use memory slightly below 1
> GB. They have
> given the reason
Hi,
I read a few articles on linux virtual memory management such as this one :
http://lwn.net/Articles/75174/
which say that earlier linux kernel could only use memory slightly below 1
GB. They have
given the reason for it but I am unable to understand.They further describe
the use of High memor
