> -Original Message-
> From: kernelnewbies-boun...@kernelnewbies.org [mailto:kernelnewbies-
> boun...@kernelnewbies.org] On Behalf Of Ruben
> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 12:10 PM
> To: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
> Subject: Re: Semaphore and Spinlock
>
>
On 04/27/2015 12:31 PM, Jeff Haran wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: kernelnewbies-bounces+jharan=bytemobile@kernelnewbies.org
>> [mailto:kernelnewbies-
>> bounces+jharan=bytemobile@kernelnewbies.org] On Behalf Of
>> Abhishek Bist
>> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 6:19 AM
>> To:
> -Original Message-
> From: kernelnewbies-bounces+jharan=bytemobile@kernelnewbies.org
> [mailto:kernelnewbies-
> bounces+jharan=bytemobile@kernelnewbies.org] On Behalf Of
> Abhishek Bist
> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 6:19 AM
> To: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
> Subject: Semapho
On 04/27/2015 09:18 AM, Abhishek Bist wrote:
> [ Semaphores are a bit like spinlocks, except the holder of a semaphore is a
> process, not a CPU. ]
> This is a very first line that is bein written on the description of
> semaphore on kernel newbies.So what are the different parameter
> that coul
