Well, I didn't do the tests, yet.
Of course, if I compile the speed-test util and load as a kernel module, it
will run in long mode. At this moment, there is no
reason to run in real mode. After the answer about the speed in long mode,
maybe port the util to real mode.
What issues & concerns will
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Gustavo da Silva wrote:
> I would like to tell myself: Ok, so, in 1second, my computer can access
> 2.000 memory cells (relatively, because there is the "inc" instruction time
> spent, for counting).
>
> I'm using a AMD Athlon 64 X2 L310 (1.2ghz).
>
> It would not be a easy t
I would like to tell myself: Ok, so, in 1second, my computer can access
2.000 memory cells (relatively, because there is the "inc" instruction time
spent, for counting).
I'm using a AMD Athlon 64 X2 L310 (1.2ghz).
It would not be a easy task (for me) to develop, because I'm not a Assembly
profiss
Very interesting!! Both the link and the movntq instruction. I'll read and
study.
Thanks Tobias!!
2012/12/8 Tobias Boege
> On Sat, 08 Dec 2012, Gustavo da Silva wrote:
> > Hello Kernel Brothers!! How are you???
> >
> > So, I would like test the performance of my notebook, developing one or
> tw
On Sat, 08 Dec 2012, Gustavo da Silva wrote:
> Hello Kernel Brothers!! How are you???
>
> So, I would like test the performance of my notebook, developing one or two
> utilities, and have a better
> mensurement about the speed.
>
> But it can help all of us.
>
> 1st: I would like mensure the spe
*mensure: measure!! Sorry about it and other typo.
2012/12/8 Gustavo da Silva
> Hello Kernel Brothers!! How are you???
>
> So, I would like test the performance of my notebook, developing one or
> two utilities, and have a better
> mensurement about the speed.
>
> But it can help all of us.
>
>
