ment/dataalign.html
>
> http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~palsetia/cit595s08/Lectures08/alignmentOrdering.pdf
>
> Essentially, atomicity and non-alignment become problematic when u tried to
> to read using non-byte addressing mode with non-aligned address.
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 5:42 P
edu/~palsetia/cit595s08/Lectures08/alignmentOrdering.pdf
> >
> > Essentially, atomicity and non-alignment become problematic when u tried
> > to to read using non-byte addressing mode with non-aligned address.
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Shraddha Kamat wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:50:14 +0100, richard -rw- weinberger said:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Shraddha Kamat wrote:
> > what is the relation between atomic operations and memory alignment ?
> >
> > I read from UTLK that "an unaligned memory access is not atomic&
to
to read using non-byte addressing mode with non-aligned address.
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Shraddha Kamat wrote:
> what is the relation between atomic operations and memory alignment ?
>
> I read from UTLK that "an unaligned memory access is not atomic"
>
>
de with non-aligned address.
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Shraddha Kamat wrote:
>
>> what is the relation between atomic operations and memory alignment ?
>>
>> I read from UTLK that "an unaligned memory access is not atomic"
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Shraddha Kamat wrote:
> what is the relation between atomic operations and memory alignment ?
>
> I read from UTLK that "an unaligned memory access is not atomic"
>
> please explain me , I am not able to get the relationship betwe
what is the relation between atomic operations and memory alignment ?
I read from UTLK that "an unaligned memory access is not atomic"
please explain me , I am not able to get the relationship between
memory alignment and atomicity of the
