Re: can a bottom half be scheduled by another BH ??

thanks a lot to all of you for the help. Vishwas S On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 8:48 PM, anish singh wrote: > > On Oct 3, 2013 8:28 PM, "sujan dutta" wrote: > > > > > > Yes you can, infact network subsystem softirq are reactive so it can run > again. > > however, reactivated softirq are not immediat

Re: can a bottom half be scheduled by another BH ??

On Oct 3, 2013 8:28 PM, "sujan dutta" wrote: > > > Yes you can, infact network subsystem softirq are reactive so it can run again. > however, reactivated softirq are not immediately process but until kernel handles the pending softirqs because it might introduce latency in user-space. > And for be

Re: can a bottom half be scheduled by another BH ??

Yes you can, infact network subsystem softirq are reactive so it can run again. however, reactivated softirq are not immediately process but until kernel handles the pending softirqs because it might introduce latency in user-space. And for better performance, when pending BH grows excessively t

can a bottom half be scheduled by another BH ??

Hi Group, I am a bit unclear if, I could schedule another BH while I am already running in a BH ? For example, if I am running in a SOFT IRQ, can I schedule a tasklet from there ?? Thanks, Vishwas S ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@ker

Re: can a bottom half be scheduled by another BH ??

Hi Group, I am a bit unclear if, I could schedule another BH while I am already running in a BH ? For example, if I am running in a SOFT IRQ, can I schedule a tasklet from there ?? ** ** Thanks, Vishwas S ** ** On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Vishwas Srivastava (vishsriv) < vish