Am 13.04.2014 22:49 schrieb Greg Donald:
> When I run checkpatch.pl -f, it complains about comment blocks like
>
> /*
> * foo
> * bar
> */
>
> with "networking block comments don't use an empty /* line, use /*
> Comment..."
>
> But I found this: http://fr.it-usenet.org/thread/18772/41342/, w
On April 13, 2014 8:04:57 PM EDT, Greg Donald wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Greg Freemyer
> wrote:
>> In general use checkpatch.pl on code you are submitting or around
>code
>> you are already patching.
>
>But I see patches that do more than one thing get turned down every
>day.
>
>>
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> In general use checkpatch.pl on code you are submitting or around code
> you are already patching.
But I see patches that do more than one thing get turned down every day.
> Sending in standalone coding style patches 9 times in 10 will resu
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Greg Donald wrote:
> When I run checkpatch.pl -f, it complains about comment blocks like
In general use checkpatch.pl on code you are submitting or around code
you are already patching.
Sending in standalone coding style patches 9 times in 10 will result
in a rej
When I run checkpatch.pl -f, it complains about comment blocks like
/*
* foo
* bar
*/
with "networking block comments don't use an empty /* line, use /* Comment..."
But I found this: http://fr.it-usenet.org/thread/18772/41342/, which
makes me think that particular checkpatch.pl warning should
