Adding to Deepak's question:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Peerless Deepak
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> Sorry forgot to append the question.
>
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Peerless Deepak
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am trying to reassign bus numbers and co
Hi,
Couple of questions:
1. How to determine the number of processes in memory ? (inside
kernel code, not shell : ps -ef | wc -l )
2. Is there any provision for swapping out entire process in linux (as
solaris has) ?
If no, then how to make sure that a process all of whose pages have
been swap
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Jonathan 'Arrouan' ROUZAUD-CORNABAS
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm developping a kernel module that will monitore struct (or something
> else) to generate event (or traces) when a process is over (i.e. its
Since all processes are forked out of some already existing process, I guess
you can place a hook in the implementation of fork. Maybe inside
kernel/sched.c. Similarly look for the function which cleans up the process
information when it gets over, that should be the place to put in the other
hook.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm developping a kernel module that will monitore struct (or something
else) to generate event (or traces) when a process is over (i.e. its PID
disappear from the PID/PPID tree). Currently, I can do that by
monitoring the /proc directory but I am
I am not sure but I think once oops happens then you may or may not remove
the module. I think it really depends on how much the oops has affected the
system. Try force remove though but I vaguely recall the same problem and I
had to resort to reboot.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:28 AM, <[EMAIL PROTEC
>The reason should be we are never going to unload the module. once the
>linux is shutdown its going to poweroff the cpu so no need to cleanup.
But what if there are some operations specified in the exit function of
module for cleaning up, which is specific to the module e.g. flushing some
module
> Hi
> i m facing this prob from long that when i use a module which i have
just inserted.
> now suppose by mistake some kernel oops occur null pointer exception
lets say ..
> now my program which was using the function of module is closed .
> so in my knowledge no one is using my module now.
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 12:43:06 Manish Katiyar wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:23 PM, nidhi mittal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> > i m facing this prob from long that when i use a module which i have just
> > inserted.
> > now suppose by mistake some kernel oops occur null pointer ex
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:23 PM, nidhi mittal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> i m facing this prob from long that when i use a module which i have just
> inserted.
> now suppose by mistake some kernel oops occur null pointer exception lets
> say ..
> now my program which was using the function of
Hi
i m facing this prob from long that when i use a module which i have just
inserted.
now suppose by mistake some kernel oops occur null pointer exception lets
say ..
now my program which was using the function of module is closed .
so in my knowledge no one is using my module now.
now i correcte
Hi Erik,
Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation. Will take care from now on.
But I still didn't understand why there is no disclaimer here, but its
there when I sent to I2C mailing list(sender is this ID for both).
Anyways, as you said best thing to use is webmail to avoid all these.
Thanks
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 13:24 +0500, Nauman Tahir wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Santosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mohamed Thalib .H wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 11:14 +0530, Santosh wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Manish Katiyar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Santo
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Santosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mohamed Thalib .H wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 11:14 +0530, Santosh wrote:
>>>
>>> Manish Katiyar wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Santosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mohamed Thalib .H wrote:
14 matches
Mail list logo
