On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Sandeep K Sinha
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Manish Katiyar wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Peter Teoh wrote:
>>> thinking deeper, i have a concern for you.
>>>
>>> based on the VFS layering concept, u have no problem if the internal
>>
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Peter Teoh wrote:
> this brings in a new dimension of analysis:
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Manish Katiyar wrote:
>>
>> Correct but that also raises few more questions. Sandeep , do you
>> have any pre-requisites about the sizing of disks for OHSM to
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Manish Katiyar wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Peter Teoh wrote:
>> thinking deeper, i have a concern for you.
>>
>> based on the VFS layering concept, u have no problem if the internal
>> of ext3 is not touch. but now u seemed to be doing a lot of s
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Peter Teoh wrote:
> thinking deeper, i have a concern for you.
>
> based on the VFS layering concept, u have no problem if the internal
> of ext3 is not touch. but now u seemed to be doing a lot of stuff at
> the ext2/ext3 layer.
>
Yes thats true, Bu
this brings in a new dimension of analysis:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Manish Katiyar wrote:
>
> Correct but that also raises few more questions. Sandeep , do you
> have any pre-requisites about the sizing of disks for OHSM to work ??
> For example lets say I have 3 disks d1, d2 & d3 in
thinking deeper, i have a concern for you.
based on the VFS layering concept, u have no problem if the internal
of ext3 is not touch. but now u seemed to be doing a lot of stuff at
the ext2/ext3 layer.
i was reading about the reservation concept in ext2/ext3 and found it
quite complex. blocks
I think i want header file..see the below errors when i used to compile
it...shar...@sharief-desktop:~/Desktop/video drivers$ gcc vgrabx.c -Wall -lX11
-o vgrabx
vgrabx.c:29:22: error: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory
vgrabx.c:30:23: error: X11/Xutil.h: No such file or directory
vgrabx.c:34:
Hi,
I've read dma mapping and dma-api kernel documentation as well as the
DMA API change at http://lwn.net/Articles/75780/ which describes fork
of dma_sync_* to dma_sync_*_for_cpu and dma_sync_*_for_device.
It seems the names of API are self explanatory and direction parameter
is not needed (exce
Hi Peter,
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Peter Teoh wrote:
> Read this on the concepts/reasoning of initramfs:
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/191004/
>
> and then this:
>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2009-January/003987.html
>
> where initramfs is preparing to be removed permane
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:29 PM, abhish agarwal wrote:
>
> Actually by testing boot sequence i mean correctness of state of the M/c
> after boot up.So consequently correctness of boot up operations.
>
> Thanks,
> Abhish
check this:
http://bcook.cs.georgiasouthern.edu/hasten.htm
many ideas/impl
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 11:30:02 Belisko Marek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Henrik Austad wrote:
> > I'm using gettimeofday to get the most accurate time from the kernel
> >
> > When I use calloc to create and initalize memory for the struct timeval
> > *tv, everything wor
Actually by testing boot sequence i mean correctness of state of the M/c after
boot up.So consequently correctness of boot up operations.
Thanks,
Abhish
--- On Tue, 13/1/09, Peter Teoh wrote:
> From: Peter Teoh
> Subject: Re: Testing Boot Sequence
> To: abhish_...@yahoo.co.in
> Cc: "Erik Mo
Hey Manish,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Manish Katiyar wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Sandeep K Sinha
> wrote:
>> Hi Manish,
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Manish Katiyar wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Sandeep K Sinha
>>> wrote:
Hi Peter,
>>>
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 10:51 +0100, Henrik Austad wrote:
> I'm using gettimeofday to get the most accurate time from the kernel
>
> When I use calloc to create and initalize memory for the struct timeval *tv,
> everything works fine:
>
> struct timeval *tv;
> tv = (struct timeval *)calloc(1, siz
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Henrik Austad wrote:
> I'm using gettimeofday to get the most accurate time from the kernel
>
> When I use calloc to create and initalize memory for the struct timeval *tv,
> everything works fine:
>
> struct timeval *tv;
> tv = (struct timeval *)calloc(1, s
I'm using gettimeofday to get the most accurate time from the kernel
When I use calloc to create and initalize memory for the struct timeval *tv,
everything works fine:
struct timeval *tv;
tv = (struct timeval *)calloc(1, sizeof(struct timeval));
if (!tv) {
/* handle error... */
exit
}
gett
ya ok micheal..i am ready to install SDL library...but is the xawtv software is
using this SDL library to display the captured pictures..?i think nothen
how it is displaying..?I think this vgrab.c requires this SDL librarydo you
have any other program to display the captured pictures co
may be u have used the term wronglybut my new understanding is
that u want to verify correctness of bootup operations, something like
that of TPM hardware.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:23 PM, abhish agarwal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to all for Ccing particular emailid's.
>
> Boot sequence i have
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Sandeep K Sinha
wrote:
> Hi Manish,
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Manish Katiyar wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Sandeep K Sinha
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Peter Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at
Hi:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Andre Prendel wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:26:45AM +0800, shark huang wrote:
>> 2009/1/10 Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen :
>> > 2009/1/9 shark huang :
>> >
>> >> Could explain more detail？For example: currently, the latest mm-tree
>> >> version
>> >
What does this error mean. I'm trying to hunt a double skb free but
before the second free I get the above messae.
Attempt to release tcp socket in state 1.
Any idea how to debug this message or what it means ?
Thanks,
San.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Attempt-to-rel
Hi Manish,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Manish Katiyar wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Sandeep K Sinha
> wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Peter Teoh wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Sandeep K Sinha
>>> wrote:
Hi Peter,
Don't
22 matches
Mail list logo
