On Sunday 22 February 2009 05:17:48 niamathullah sharief wrote:
Actually i disabled the USB support in make menuconfig while building a
kernelnow i have to make that USB port enable dynamically...that is
while kernel runswhat are all the modules are needed to enable the USB
port...?how
i'm sure i could verify this by RTFS but i've had a long week and
i'm feeling lazy so ... is it true that i can protect an MTD partition
from accidental overwriting by defining it in the map file with the
MAP_WRITEABLE flag?
and having done that, the only way to change that partition would
Hi Robert,
El Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 02:02:12PM -0500 Robert P. J. Day ha dit:
i'm sure i could verify this by RTFS but i've had a long week and
i'm feeling lazy so ... is it true that i can protect an MTD partition
from accidental overwriting by defining it in the map file with the
El Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 08:37:15PM +0100 Matthias Kaehlcke ha dit:
Hi Robert,
El Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 02:02:12PM -0500 Robert P. J. Day ha dit:
i'm sure i could verify this by RTFS but i've had a long week and
i'm feeling lazy so ... is it true that i can protect an MTD partition
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Kevin Wilson wkev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Following is a simple kernel module of 40 lines which only registers a
misc device. I insmod the module and it is ok; the return value of
misc_register() is 0.
ls -al /dev/mymodule
gives:
crw-rw 1 root
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:47:19AM +0530, arun c wrote:
...
Yes I don't need any lock to protect my data
here, as host is write only and target is read only.
Here is what I did.
typedef command_pkt {
u32 valid;
..
..
..
u32 data[];
}
typedef struct my_circ_buf {
u32
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Grant Grundler
grund...@parisc-linux.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:47:19AM +0530, arun c wrote:
...
Yes I don't need any lock to protect my data
here, as host is write only and target is read only.
Here is what I did.
typedef command_pkt {
