Johnny Hung wrote:
2010/1/22 Marco Stornelli marco.storne...@gmail.com:
2010/1/22 Johnny Hung johnny.hack...@gmail.com:
2010/1/20 Marco Stornelli marco.storne...@gmail.com:
2010/1/20 Johnny Hung johnny.hack...@gmail.com:
2010/1/19 Matthias Kaehlcke matth...@kaehlcke.net:
El Tue, Jan 19,
Peter Teoh wrote:
similar from previous links posted, a lot of solutions are
distro-specific, and varies from version to version:
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org/msg351306.html
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Peter Teoh htmldevelo...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having some trouble accessing 'current' to get the currently
executing task in kgdb (x86_64).
As current is a macro, I can't expand it in kgdb, so instead I'm
trying to access the variable per_cpu__current_task inorder to get the
task_struct for the currently executing task. But the memory
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:11:18PM +0530, Himanshu Chauhan wrote:
Hi All,
The sysfs_ops's show vector doesn't have a size of the
buffer given to the vector, while store on the other hand
has. What is the rationale behind it?
If you need to check the size, you are doing something wrong.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:36:46PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:11:18PM +0530, Himanshu Chauhan wrote:
Hi All,
The sysfs_ops's show vector doesn't have a size of the
buffer given to the vector, while store on the other hand
has. What is the rationale behind it?
Hi Joel.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 03:23:03AM +0530, Joel Fernandes wrote:
I am having some trouble accessing 'current' to get the currently
executing task in kgdb (x86_64).
As current is a macro, I can't expand it in kgdb, so instead I'm
trying to access the variable per_cpu__current_task
Hi All,
Where should I send small patches? Patches which address small
compilation warnings etc. Linux kernel mailing list receives a
lot of heavy weight patches and small patches get lost. Which
is the best place to send, then? Is Kernel Janitor mailing
list alive?
Regards
Himanshu
--
To
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Himanshu Chauhan
hschau...@nulltrace.org wrote:
Hi All,
Where should I send small patches? Patches which address small
compilation warnings etc. Linux kernel mailing list receives a
lot of heavy weight patches and small patches get lost. Which
is the best
