Stoyan Gaydarov wrote:
I compiled my kernel(for x86_64) and i was wondering why it had to
create an x86_64 directory under the arch directory?
I assume that it is creating the directory so that binary objects, created by
the build, can be placed there rather than the x86 directory.
This may
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Stoyan Gaydarov stoyboy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Rohit Sharma imreckl...@gmail.com wrote:
Linux supports many architectures for its portability.
So architecture specific codes resides in arch directory.
Ya i know that but there should
I compiled my kernel(for x86_64) and i was wondering why it had to
create an x86_64 directory under the arch directory?
PS. This may have been caused by the packaging script but i am also
not sure how to check (.deb packaging)
--
-Stoyan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
Linux supports many architectures for its portability.
So architecture specific codes resides in arch directory.
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Stoyan Gaydarov stoyboy...@gmail.com wrote:
I compiled my kernel(for x86_64) and i was wondering why it had to
create an x86_64 directory under the
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Rohit Sharma imreckl...@gmail.com wrote:
Linux supports many architectures for its portability.
So architecture specific codes resides in arch directory.
Ya i know that but there should not be an x86_64 directory just the
x86 one...these were combined some time
