Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-13 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:40:32PM +0800, Peter Teoh wrote: some questions: a. the list of parameters can presumably be extracted from existing file via procname search.not sure if it is correct (as per attached, complete?) I don't see anything attached :( b. what is the diff

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-13 Thread Mulyadi Santosa
Hi... On Feb 13, 2008 11:43 AM, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any doc additions or improvements would be appreciated. I'll be glad to help get them merged... You can see my post here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/26/100 Let me know if the patch format is still wrong or anything that I

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Scott Lovenberg
Peter Teoh wrote: On Feb 12, 2008 2:17 PM, Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 12, 2008 12:23 AM, Peter Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was looking for documentation on the kstack_depth_to_print under /proc/sys/kernel, and I found it in Documentation/sysctl.txt

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Mulyadi Santosa
Hi all... Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile= kernel param. It's not accepted by Adrian Bunk, but at least I did it. Feedback? regards, Mulyadi. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: Hi all... Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile= kernel param. It's not accepted by Adrian Bunk, but at least I did it. Feedback?

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Peter Teoh
On 2/13/08, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: Hi all... Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile= kernel param. It's not accepted

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Scott Lovenberg
Randy Dunlap wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: Hi all... Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile= kernel param. It's not accepted by Adrian Bunk, but at least I did

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Manish Katiyar
On Feb 13, 2008 11:29 AM, Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Randy Dunlap wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: Hi all... Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:59:43AM -0500, Scott Lovenberg wrote: Randy Dunlap wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: Hi all... Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Peter Teoh
On 2/13/08, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:59:43AM -0500, Scott Lovenberg wrote: Randy Dunlap wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: Hi all... Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel documentation

Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-11 Thread Peter Teoh
I was looking for documentation on the kstack_depth_to_print under /proc/sys/kernel, and I found it in Documentation/sysctl.txt (written by Rik). How about /proc/sys/net? or all other directories under /sys or /proc fs? Wouldn't it be useful to have a centralized store located in