On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 18:14 +0700, Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> Hi...
>
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Himanshu Chauhan
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:47 +0700, Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> >> Hi..
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Himanshu Chauhan
> >> wrote:
> >> > Am I correct whe
Hi...
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Himanshu Chauhan wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:47 +0700, Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
>> Hi..
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Himanshu Chauhan
>> wrote:
>> > Am I correct when I say that try_to_free_pages is called in direct
>> > reclaim, and balance_pg
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:47 +0700, Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> Hi..
>
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Himanshu Chauhan
> wrote:
> > Am I correct when I say that try_to_free_pages is called in direct
> > reclaim, and balance_pgdat is invoked, directly or indirectly, by
> > kswapd?
>
> let me make
Hi..
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Himanshu Chauhan wrote:
> Am I correct when I say that try_to_free_pages is called in direct
> reclaim, and balance_pgdat is invoked, directly or indirectly, by
> kswapd?
let me make your question clear first. Do you ask this in the kswapd's
poin of view? If
Am I correct when I say that try_to_free_pages is called in direct
reclaim, and balance_pgdat is invoked, directly or indirectly, by
kswapd?
Thanks
Regards
- Himanshu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecar...@nl.linux.org
Please read the FAQ at
