On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:06 PM, askb wrote:
> > I need to do lot of small allocations (around 70-80 bytes) from a
> > critical region
> > while holding a spinlock. Total number of such allocation could go
> > upto tens of
> > thousands in few hours. So all these allocations use GFP_ATOMIC flag
>
> I need to do lot of small allocations (around 70-80 bytes) from a
> critical region
> while holding a spinlock. Total number of such allocation could go
> upto tens of
> thousands in few hours. So all these allocations use GFP_ATOMIC flag
> instead of
> GFP_KERNEL. As per my understanding, GFP_A
Hi List,
I need to do lot of small allocations (around 70-80 bytes) from a critical
region
while holding a spinlock. Total number of such allocation could go upto tens
of
thousands in few hours. So all these allocations use GFP_ATOMIC flag instead
of
GFP_KERNEL. As per my understanding, GFP_ATOMIC