Hi Vegard, I have some questions for you.
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Vegard Nossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Peter Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not spamming, it is educationthank for the info. BTW...I
think u gave me an idea now..
On 5/29/08, Peter Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vegard, I have some questions for you.
[...]
Second, your present tried to retain the CR3 value, but change the
contents of the page table insteadbut has problem with
multiprocessor.
How about the other way round - change the
thanks againyour one reply now generate a thousands other threads
of questions:-)thanks for the trouble taken...programming is
hardwork!!!
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Vegard Nossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/29/08, Peter Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vegard, I have some
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Vegard Nossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/29/08, Peter Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vegard, I have some questions for you.
[...]
Second, your present tried to retain the CR3 value, but change the
contents of the page table insteadbut has
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Vegard Nossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Vegard Nossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/29/08, Peter Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vegard, I have some questions for you.
[...]
Second, your present tried to retain the CR3
Hi,
I am trying to broadcast an NMI like this:
send_IPI_allbutself(NMI_VECTOR);
But when I do this, I get a divide error:
...
CPU: L1 I cache: 8K
CPU: L2 cache: 128K
CPU1: Intel Pentium II (Klamath) stepping 03
checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 - CPU#1]: passed.
Brought up 2 CPUs
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Vegard Nossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Vegard Nossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to broadcast an NMI like this:
send_IPI_allbutself(NMI_VECTOR);
But when I do this, I get a divide error:
...
CPU: L1 I
It is not spamming, it is educationthank for the info. BTW...I
think u gave me an idea now..
Currently your kmemcheck is restricted to only one CPU. Why not
ALWAYS enable all the CPU to run at the same timeBUT WHEN AND
ONLY WHEN read operation is detected on one
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Peter Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not spamming, it is educationthank for the info. BTW...I
think u gave me an idea now..
Currently your kmemcheck is restricted to only one CPU. Why not
ALWAYS enable all the CPU to run at the same
